On 2019-06-17, Quentin Rameau wrote:
>> On 2019-06-17, Quentin Rameau wrote:
>> >> How do you deal with ~250 lines of "Untracked files:" in the `git
>> >> status` output?
Can you answer this question? I'm curious why this doesn't obstruct
your workflow.
>> >> If you want to see them, you can al
> On 2019-06-17, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> >> How do you deal with ~250 lines of "Untracked files:" in the `git
> >> status` output?
> >>
> >> If you want to see them, you can always run `git status --ignored`.
> >
> > If you want it, you can always run `make .gitignore` *once*.
>
> Once for every
On 2019-06-17, Quentin Rameau wrote:
>> How do you deal with ~250 lines of "Untracked files:" in the `git
>> status` output?
>>
>> If you want to see them, you can always run `git status --ignored`.
>
> If you want it, you can always run `make .gitignore` *once*.
Once for every clone of sbase.
>
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 13:40:47 -0700
Michael Forney wrote:
> On 2019-06-17, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> >> What's the downside to having it checked into the repository? Are
> >> there any reasons why a user wouldn't want this feature? Personally, I
> >> want it in every clone of sbase I make, and I im
On 2019-06-17, Quentin Rameau wrote:
>> What's the downside to having it checked into the repository? Are
>> there any reasons why a user wouldn't want this feature? Personally, I
>> want it in every clone of sbase I make, and I imagine most other
>> people want this as well. It is annoying to hav
> > I'm not really keen on pushing this file to the source history, I think
> > this should be kept separate, this is a user-side feature.
>
> What's the downside to having it checked into the repository? Are
> there any reasons why a user wouldn't want this feature? Personally, I
> want it in eve
On 2019-06-13, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
>> Also, add rule to regenerate in case executable list changes.
>> ---
>> Any objection to this?
>
> I'm not really keen on pushing this file to the source history, I think
> this should be kept separate, this is a user-side feature.
What's
Hello Michael,
> Also, add rule to regenerate in case executable list changes.
> ---
> Any objection to this?
I'm not really keen on pushing this file to the source history, I think
this should be kept separate, this is a user-side feature.
But having a rule un the Makefile, as you did, is a goo
Also, add rule to regenerate in case executable list changes.
---
Any objection to this?
.gitignore | 99 ++
Makefile | 5 ++-
2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 .gitignore
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitign
