Re: [hackers] [st][patch] Made underlines and strikethroughs respect `chscale`.

2022-03-13 Thread Zacchary Dempsey-Plante
On Sunday, March 13th, 2022 at 09:49, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 04:26:14PM +, Zacchary Dempsey-Plante wrote: > > > On Saturday, March 12th, 2022 at 16:19, Hiltjo Posthuma > > hil...@codemadness.org wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 03:24:57PM +, Zacchary De

Re: [hackers] [st][patch] Made underlines and strikethroughs respect `chscale`.

2022-03-13 Thread Hiltjo Posthuma
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 04:26:14PM +, Zacchary Dempsey-Plante wrote: > On Saturday, March 12th, 2022 at 16:19, Hiltjo Posthuma > wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 03:24:57PM +, Zacchary Dempsey-Plante wrote: > > > > > During my submission of the charoffsets customisation patch, I foun

Re: [hackers] [st][patch] Made underlines and strikethroughs respect `chscale`.

2022-03-12 Thread Zacchary Dempsey-Plante
On Saturday, March 12th, 2022 at 16:19, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 03:24:57PM +, Zacchary Dempsey-Plante wrote: > > > During my submission of the charoffsets customisation patch, I found that > > the underline and strikethrough rendering didn't take `chscale` into > >

Re: [hackers] [st][patch] Made underlines and strikethroughs respect `chscale`.

2022-03-12 Thread Hiltjo Posthuma
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 03:24:57PM +, Zacchary Dempsey-Plante wrote: > During my submission of the charoffsets customisation patch, I found that the > underline and strikethrough rendering didn't take `chscale` into account. > This meant that when using `chscale < 1.0`, underlines were not vis

[hackers] [st][patch] Made underlines and strikethroughs respect `chscale`.

2022-03-12 Thread Zacchary Dempsey-Plante
During my submission of the charoffsets customisation patch, I found that the underline and strikethrough rendering didn't take `chscale` into account. This meant that when using `chscale < 1.0`, underlines were not visible. The patch contents are below. Apologies if I've done anything wrong when