Re: HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-17 Thread Ted Dunning
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] > m> To > > 10/16/2007 12:53 cc > PM >

Re: HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-17 Thread TREVORSTEWART
10/16/2007 12:53 cc PM Subject Re: HDFS vs

OT: HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-16 Thread Jonathan Hendler
Open source is enjoyable - it's a strange world where people share what they think - openly. It's free speech and you won't always get that from closed source. It's often foreign for engineers who are working alone, in well funded startups, or in established, proven, but traditional companies. E

Re: HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-16 Thread Garth Patil
10/16/2007 12:32 cc > > PM > >Subject > >Re: HDFS vs. CIFS > > Please respond to > > [EMAIL PRO

Re: HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-16 Thread Ted Dunning
m> To > > 10/16/2007 12:32 cc > PM > Subject >

Re: HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-16 Thread TREVORSTEWART
To 10/16/2007 12:32 cc PM Subject Re: HD

Re: HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-16 Thread Ted Dunning
To > .com> > cc > 10/15/2007 05:20 > PMSubject >

RE: HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-16 Thread TREVORSTEWART
Subject RE: HDFS vs. CIFS Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-15 Thread Joydeep Sen Sarma
onday, October 15, 2007 12:24 PM To: hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: HDFS vs. CIFS I would like someone to compare and contrast CIFS and HDFS? Or...if that is not a valid comparison...please explain to me why it's not a valid comparison. Thanks, Trevor . This message and any attachmen

Re: HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-15 Thread Ted Dunning
CIFS is a file system, that doesn't scale particularly well, nor does it support parallelisation of programs very well. HDFS isn't quite a file system. At least not in the sense of something that does all the things that you expect a file system to do (CRUD operations, access control, meta-data)

HDFS vs. CIFS

2007-10-15 Thread TREVORSTEWART
I would like someone to compare and contrast CIFS and HDFS? Or...if that is not a valid comparison...please explain to me why it's not a valid comparison. Thanks, Trevor .