Re: [haml] Re: From LESS to SCSS: joys and miseries

2011-03-19 Thread Chris Eppstein
I don't like that having an extension behaves differently than not. That is sure to trip some people up. In my ideal syntax we'd have the following: @import => A browser-based import with no special meaning @include => Does what @import does now for sass/scss files @mix => Does what @include does

[haml] Re: From LESS to SCSS: joys and miseries

2011-03-19 Thread Raving Genius
I agree that @import foo.css should work as in regular CSS, but the proposal for @import foo makes a lot of sense to me. The proposed behavior would be a win because it would automatically remove an extra GET request by inlining the CSS. It would also be more consistent with importing sass or scss