Is there a way to tell HAML to leave a tag open?
For example I have 2 partial files, a header and a footer. If I use
HAML on the header it will automatically close and in
the header file.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this
I have this exact setup: separate header and footer files. What I usually do
is just escape the tags:
\
%head
... head stuff here ...
\
then in the footer
.my-footer-div
... blah blah ...
\
\
Amy
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Michael Narciso wrote:
> I
I assume you're using rails. If so, you should be using layouts for keeping
the "surrounding concerns" together. The approach you're trying to take is
an error-prone one and haml discourages it by making it impossible.
chris
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Michael Narciso wrote:
> Is there a w
Don't do that. See previous reply.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Amy L wrote:
> I have this exact setup: separate header and footer files. What I usually
> do is just escape the tags:
>
> \
> %head
> ... head stuff here ...
> \
>
> then in the footer
>
> .my-footer-div
>
Can you give an example of a "good" practice?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Chris Eppstein wrote:
> Don't do that. See previous reply.
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Amy L wrote:
>
>> I have this exact setup: separate header and footer files. What I usually
>> do is just escape the tag
Use one wrapping layout file and then 2 partials for each section, e.g.
!!!
%html
%head= render :partial => "header"
%body= render :partial => "body"
All nice and tidy, and the partials dont have to worry about opening or
closing their wrapping tags.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Amy L w
I am not using rails unfortunately. This is for a PHP project. I am just
using haml to speed up the html markup and accepting that haml looks at
smarty tags as plain text. It's working quite nice except for this.
Amy's solution is what I am looking for.
Thanks!
Amy L wrote:
Can you give an e
So for every controller that has views you would have to essentially make
copies of the layout file?
The reason I started doing header partials and footer partials separate was
because each page needs to set different titles and include different
CSS/JS. I couldn't have the one-layout-fits-all or
Haml really isn't designed to be used outside the context of a framework. It
has no concept of layouts or partials/includes. If you want to stay DRY then
you need to find a framework of some sort that provides those facilities.
Chris
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Amy L wrote:
> So for every
Chris Eppstein wrote:
Haml really isn't designed to be used outside the context of a
framework. It has no concept of layouts or partials/includes. If you
want to stay DRY then you need to find a framework of some sort that
provides those facilities.
I completely agree. I am in the prototyping
When prototyping html designs with haml/sass I recently starting use webby
heavily, as its a nice lightweight tool that provides this sort of
functionality: http://webby.rubyforge.org/
Provides a quick way to break the design into layouts, partials, and add
helpers (here's what I use http://gis
11 matches
Mail list logo
