Re: [haml] Why does test environment default to :ugly => false?

2010-05-10 Thread Nathan Weizenbaum
I sort of meant to include this change in 3.0.0. I'll push it out in 3.0.1. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Mislav Marohnić wrote: > I'd keep :ugly => false in development, but everyone else true by all > means. > Haml is so fast that the overhead in development can't be felt, but it > certainly

Re: [haml] Why does test environment default to :ugly => false?

2010-05-10 Thread Mislav Marohnić
I'd keep :ugly => false in development, but everyone else true by all means. Haml is so fast that the overhead in development can't be felt, but it certainly can in other environments. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 21:54, Chris Eppstein wrote: > In my opinion, :ugly should always be true. It's way fas

Re: [haml] Why does test environment default to :ugly => false?

2010-05-10 Thread Chris Eppstein
In my opinion, :ugly should always be true. It's way faster. formatted output is either for debugging or stroking your geek ego. I set it to true in environment.rb. chris On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Chris Hanks wrote: > Hi - > > I'm just now playing with HAML in Rails 3 and really enjoyin

[haml] Why does test environment default to :ugly => false?

2010-05-10 Thread Chris Hanks
Hi - I'm just now playing with HAML in Rails 3 and really enjoying it (and congratulations on the 3.0.0 release). Question, though - I get why the :ugly option defaults to false on the development environment and true on production, but why is it false on test? Is there some reason you'd want the