2009/1/5 Adrian Bridgett adr...@smop.co.uk:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:23:04 + (+), Richard Danter wrote:
Hi all,
I have been developing a couple of little apps to make my life easier
at work. All has been going well until my host was upgraded to 64-bit.
One of the libs I have to use
Rob Malpass wrote:
I'll stick to TVs offering VGA and keep trying.
Have a look at the ALdi offerings - they have quite a range of
TV's (most with dvi and/or VGA connections) and the prices are not
too bad for 'high street'.
Not bought one or even asked if I coudl plugthe lappie into one in
32 ideally. It's just that time of year I guess. The shops I've
looked
at that allow you to check stock levels prior to buying (argos, comet etc)
have plenty of 32 TVs without PC inputs, but I had to go over 400 quid
before I could find one both in stock and having PC input. There were
Hi,
You can also connect a graphics card with DVI to an HDMI monitor with a simple
adaptor you should be able to pick up for about a tenner at somewhere like
Richer Sounds.
Cheers,
Paul.
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
-Original Message-
From: James Courtier-Dutton
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:55:33PM +, Dr Adam Trickett wrote:
PS. Why does your GPG signature show up as invalid?
It validated OK for me.
Cheers,
Andy
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:36:31PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:55:33PM +, Dr Adam Trickett wrote:
PS. Why does your GPG signature show up as invalid?
It validated OK for me.
OK, that's *really* weird. My copy-to-self of that mail is bad.
Hugo.
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:36:31 +
Andy Smith a...@lug.org.uk wrote:
Hello Andy,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 08:55:33PM +, Dr Adam Trickett wrote:
PS. Why does your GPG signature show up as invalid?
It validated OK for me.
Hugo's PGP sig is always invalid for me. $DEITY knows why though.
Jim Kissel wrote:
Apologies to the list. Not a s/w problem.
I know where you are coming from Jim, but no real need to apologise IMO
- the information is now there for anyone else who encounters a similar
problem and turns this thread up in a search, after all.
I don't want that to sound
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:52:45 +
Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
Hello Hugo,
OK, that's *really* weird. My copy-to-self of that mail is bad.
And just to prove me a liar, the sig on that message validated okay.
H.. :-(
--
Regards _
/ ) The blindingly
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:54:44PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:52:45 +
Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
Hello Hugo,
OK, that's *really* weird. My copy-to-self of that mail is bad.
And just to prove me a liar, the sig on that message validated okay.
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 at 03:22:56PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
H.. :-(
On investigation, it seems that all of the bad sigs (and some good
ones) were sent from my server, which is what I use most of the time.
I haven't yet found a bad signature on mails sent from my desktop
I need to enquire on the collective the wisdom of the Hampshire lug
I got asked by one of the directors at work if it was possible to setup a
forum on our network at work (only internal access) so that our workshop
staff can post service messages\questions amongst themselves. We have 11 site
Problem is I have no idea about forum software (and very little about
apache),
I found phpBB (which I know about from a couple of forums I am subscribed
to). But today I got to thinking could we get a way with using a Wiki, is
it
possible??
Not only possible - I'd reccomend it.
We ran a
2009/1/6 Daniel Pope ma...@mauveweb.co.uk:
Tim wrote:
But today I got to thinking could we get a way with using a Wiki, is it
possible??
With a wiki the quality of the content becomes better over time as it is
amended
and improved and that can grow to be an authoritative reference. However
I find mediawiki a bit heavy. Dokuwiki is my personal favourite and it
uses the filesystem instead of nasssty databases.
We also use Request Tracker at work and it's not bad and has the
benefit of being (able to be) tied into your email system.
Joe
--
Please post to:
On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Tim wrote:
I need to enquire on the collective the wisdom of the Hampshire lug
I got asked by one of the directors at work if it was possible to setup a
forum on our network at work (only internal access) so that our workshop
staff can post service
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:47:25PM +, Dr Adam J Trickett wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 at 03:22:56PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
H.. :-(
On investigation, it seems that all of the bad sigs (and some good
ones) were sent from my server, which is what I use most of the
2009/1/5 Dr Adam Trickett adam.trick...@iredale.net:
I think Damian has got us in the next Saturday for this occasion, but we are
always looking for new possible locations.
For me the following Saturday, 17th, at Southampton would be beast.
Clive Woodfine
--
Please post to:
Hi Hugo,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 05:21:46PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
I've upgraded mutt and gpg on my server to etch-backports, and
changed the /etc/Muttrc to the packaged version, and my last mail
checks out OK with a good signature on the desktop box, but fails on
the server. I think the
Test message.
--
=== Hugo Mills: h...@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- Great oxymorons of the world, no. 2: Common Sense ---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Test message.
--
=== Hugo Mills: h...@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- Great oxymorons of the world, no. 2: Common Sense ---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
On Tuesday 06 Jan 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
I've upgraded mutt and gpg on my server to etch-backports, and
changed the /etc/Muttrc to the packaged version, and my last mail
checks out OK with a good signature on the desktop box, but fails on
the server. I think the next job is to strace mutt
On Tuesday 06 Jan 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
Test message.
BAD
--
Adam Trickett
Overton, HANTS, UK
A bank is a place where they lend you an umbrella in fair
weather and ask for it back when it begins to rain.
-- Robert Frost
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
I bought mine from ebay. It cost £4.48 (including postage) as opposed to the
£79.99 from Currys.
Regards
Bryan
--- On Tue, 6/1/09, Paul Stimpson p...@stimpsonfamily.co.uk wrote:
You can also connect a graphics card with DVI to an HDMI monitor with a simple
adaptor you should be able to
B STEVENS wrote:
I bought mine from ebay. It cost £4.48 (including postage) as opposed
to the £79.99 from Currys.
Okay, with postage my ebay bargain doesn't look quite so good, but I got
a new Antec PSU to replace my daughter's noisy no-name effort in her
Antec case* for a penny!
A system
Dr Adam Trickett wrote:
On Tuesday 06 Jan 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
Test message.
BAD
Interesting. This one's good for me.
Chris
--
Chris Smith cj...@zepler.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface:
Dr Adam Trickett wrote:
On Tuesday 06 Jan 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
Test message.
Looks good.
And this one is bad for me. (Ubuntu Intrepid, gpg 1.4.9)
Chris
--
Chris Smith cj...@zepler.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Please post to:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 08:04:05PM +, Chris Smith wrote:
Dr Adam Trickett wrote:
On Tuesday 06 Jan 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
Test message.
Looks good.
And this one is bad for me. (Ubuntu Intrepid, gpg 1.4.9)
This is good on gpg 1.4.9 (my desktop), but bad on gpg 1.4.6 (my
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:22:56 +
Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
Hello Hugo,
On investigation, it seems that all of the bad sigs (and some good
ones) were sent from my server, which is what I use most of the time.
The bad sigs I've seen from other people are sometimes caused by an
Tim wrote:
I need to enquire on the collective the wisdom of the Hampshire lug
I got asked by one of the directors at work if it was possible to setup a
forum on our network
If you want a forum then mwforum.org (Perl based) is a good forum and
much cleaner than phpBB3 . If you think the
Dr Adam Trickett wrote:
On Tuesday 06 Jan 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
I've upgraded mutt and gpg on my server to etch-backports, and
changed the /etc/Muttrc to the packaged version, and my last mail
checks out OK with a good signature on the desktop box, but fails on
the server. I think the
31 matches
Mail list logo
