On Sat, April 24, 2010 17:58, Tim wrote:
If we are going down the road of stupid distro names, I see Debian as no
more
stupid than Fedora (Red Hat) or maybe Crunchbang!! They are both equally
as
stupid as Zenwalk as a distro name.
So what in your opinion would be a cool distro name?
--
Imran Chaudhry wrote:
Is it now time to give up on Linux and 'ask Bill'?
Hi Ben, sorry to hear of the problems you've been having with your Linux
distro.
Ben consider bringing the box along and some kind folks will probably help sort
your problems out.
Re the hardware issue I did have a
Is it now time to give up on Linux and 'ask Bill'?
Hi Ben, sorry to hear of the problems you've been having with your Linux
distro.
Oops forgot to add - a couple of the of surrey luggers are always trying to find
homes for old hardware - if you do find you have a mem fault and need esoteric
On Sunday 25 April 2010 10:11:57 Jan Henkins wrote:
On Sat, April 24, 2010 17:58, Tim wrote:
If we are going down the road of stupid distro names, I see Debian as no
more
stupid than Fedora (Red Hat) or maybe Crunchbang!! They are both equally
as
stupid as Zenwalk as a distro name.
So
My vote for the stupidest name goes to 'Windows'.
How daft is that?
It's a name representing its original purpose: providing a graphical
user interface where applications are presented in a window.
It seems quite logical and sensible doesn't it.
--
Stuart Winter
Slackware ARM:
Hi,
Before I give/throw stuff away does anyone want:
Dell Dimension XPS 200n desktop PC, Pentium Pro 200, 128Mb RAM and various
working bits. Is running Debian fine, will run Fluxbox but probably best
suited for non graphical tasks.
BT Quartet 2015 cordless telephone base station and PSU,
The author of get underscore i player (at linux centre dot net) has
retired his program which is a shame.
The latest one I have is 2.42, but 2.72 seems to have been available.
Does anyone have a copy of it? It seems to be quite hard to find,
belying the old internet adage that once it's out
The author of get underscore i player (at linux centre dot net) has
retired his program which is a shame.
The latest one I have is 2.42, but 2.72 seems to have been available.
Does anyone have a copy of it? It seems to be quite hard to find,
belying the old internet adage that once it's
I've got 2.67, which is a bit better than 2.42. I'd also like to get
hold of 2.72 if anyone has it. If not I'd be happy to supply 2.67
Simon Reap wrote:
The author of get underscore i player (at linux centre dot net) has
retired his program which is a shame.
The latest one I have is 2.42,
On Sunday 25 Apr 2010 19:18:26 Stephen Rowles wrote:
I've got 2.67, which is a bit better than 2.42. I'd also like to get
hold of 2.72 if anyone has it. If not I'd be happy to supply 2.67
Simon Reap wrote:
The author of get underscore i player (at linux centre dot net) has
retired his
On 25 April 2010 15:39, Stuart Winter m-li...@biscuit.org.uk wrote:
My vote for the stupidest name goes to 'Windows'.
How daft is that?
It's a name representing its original purpose: providing a graphical
user interface where applications are presented in a window.
It seems quite
On 25/04/2010 19:48, Alan Blanchflower wrote:
I have 2.72:
http://alanblanchflower.co.uk/stuff/get_iplayer_2.72.tar.bz2
Thanks to Alan, Stephen and I now have 2.72, and thanks to jack we have
future versions too!
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface:
Lisi wrote:
On Friday 23 April 2010 16:32:46 Benjamin Ashton wrote:
Hmmm
I'm afraid my love affair with Linux is beginning to wane.Â
After finding that the spellcheck in OpenOffice was failing to work
(despite Hunspell being apparently installed), and that the OoHelp was
Stephen Rowles wrote:
I've got 2.67, which is a bit better than 2.42. I'd also like to get
hold of 2.72 if anyone has it. If not I'd be happy to supply 2.67
Simon Reap wrote:
The author of get underscore i player (at linux centre dot net) has
retired his program which is a shame.
The
jack wrote:
how about this...somebody has forked it:
http://github.com/jjl/get_iplayer
I agree the original code is a mess (given the change history thsi is to
be expected) but a rewrite is a major job - espy against an actively hostile
moving target.
Jacqui
--
Please post to:
Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Open Office is awful. It's roughly where MS Office was a decade ago.
I disagree - Ooo has book building modes only (hi-end DTP) tools such as
framemaker have.
For creation of formal documents such specifications Ooo beats MSOffice hands
down
- for my needs at least!
16 matches
Mail list logo
