On 3 July 2010 17:17, Dr A. J. Trickett wrote:
>
>> One [1] suggests that USB hardware can be used as a Trojan horse to
>> steal your data.
>
> It's possible. Though there are probably easier ways to steal data.
I was wondering about this - but what device would it have to identify
as in order to
From: hampshire-boun...@mailman.lug.org.uk
[mailto:hampshire-boun...@mailman.lug.org.uk] On Behalf Of Jan Henkins
Sent: 03 July 2010 19:45
To: Hampshire LUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hampshire] Lucid network manager
Thanks for your advice but I'm afraid one of the commands doesn't wor
I am looking for a light weight laptop which is powerfull and also is
supported in GNU/linux ( hopes for all free drivers)
It would be nice if the laptop could run compiz + openoffice+ firefox(
10 tabs +gmail) without any delays .
Regards,
Pavithran
--
pavithran sakamuri
--
Please post to:
On 04/07/10 10:06, Rob Malpass wrote:
> *From:* hampshire-boun...@mailman.lug.org.uk
> [mailto:hampshire-boun...@mailman.lug.org.uk] *On Behalf Of *Jan Henkins
> *Sent:* 03 July 2010 19:45
> *To:* Hampshire LUG Discussion List
> *Subject:* Re: [Hampshire] Lucid network manager
>
> Thanks for your a
interesting to see the range of opinions in the NS articles' comments,
regarding the 'rights and wrongs' of the reaearch being disclosed.
On 04/07/2010, Anton Piatek wrote:
> On 3 July 2010 17:17, Dr A. J. Trickett wrote:
>>
>>> One [1] suggests that USB hardware can be used as a Trojan horse to
> One [1] suggests that USB hardware can be used as a Trojan horse to
> steal your data.
I don't know if this is flawed research or flawed reporting, but the
article leaves a very misleading impression.
The researcher has correctly identified that there is an explicit trust
relationship between
