On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:09:56 +0100
"Rob Malpass" wrote:
Hello Rob,
> So in short - I guess my question is: Is SCSI so old it's not worth
> bothering with?
These days, TBH, I'd simply go with SATA. Partly because it's so simple
to connect devices to, and partly because drive sizes measured in
te
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:09:56 +0100, Rob Malpass wrote:
>Hi all
>
>
>
>Are SCSI devices worth the bother nowadays?
>
>
>
>From last week's post (and thanks for replies) it seems tape is the way and
>that USB drives are around £200 for the drive unit. I can get a SCSI
>Ultrium drive much more che
Hi all
Are SCSI devices worth the bother nowadays?
>From last week's post (and thanks for replies) it seems tape is the way and
that USB drives are around £200 for the drive unit. I can get a SCSI
Ultrium drive much more cheaply and the tapes aren't that pricey either at a
fiver each.
