On Saturday 08 October 2011 19:29:17 Martin N wrote:
> Lo,
>
> At 16:51 07/10/2011, you wrote:
> >On Thursday 06 October 2011 15:29:41 Martin N wrote:
> > > This is my exchange in westhoughton lancashire
> > >
> > > http://www.samknows.com/broadband/exchange/LCWES
> > >
> > > There seems to be only
Lo,
At 16:51 07/10/2011, you wrote:
On Thursday 06 October 2011 15:29:41 Martin N wrote:
> This is my exchange in westhoughton lancashire
>
> http://www.samknows.com/broadband/exchange/LCWES
>
> There seems to be only a few LLU looking at that list which are:
>
> LLU operator presence:
>
> AOL:
Lo,
At 13:48 08/10/2011, you wrote:
On Saturday 08 October 2011 02:59:38 Martin N wrote:
> Less prone as in less reliable on BT servicing the line if anything
> goes wrong and
> the included wait?
Less prone to BRAS/speed drops due to random resyncs, better equipment and
management of in the ex
Annex A upto 16 down and _1_.3 up sorry
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--
On Saturday 08 October 2011 02:59:38 Martin N wrote:
> Less prone as in less reliable on BT servicing the line if anything
> goes wrong and
> the included wait?
Less prone to BRAS/speed drops due to random resyncs, better equipment and
management of in the exchange, and usually upto twice the per
