Re: [Hampshire] 8% Packet loss due to ethernet cable

2021-03-04 Thread Chris Ellis via Hampshire
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 6:39 PM Joseph Bennie via Hampshire < hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk> wrote: > Actually the issue is more likely naturally collisions on the network. > > I noted that you said ‘hub’ not ‘switch’. > It's actually really hard to get hold of a true 'hub' these days. When most

Re: [Hampshire] 8% Packet loss due to ethernet cable

2021-03-04 Thread Keith Edmunds via Hampshire
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 18:39:04 +, hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk said: > Actually the issue is more likely naturally collisions on the network. Changing a cable wouldn't fix that (although I agree with your post in general). -- Linux Tips: https://www.tiger-computing.co.uk/category/techtips/

Re: [Hampshire] 8% Packet loss due to ethernet cable

2021-03-04 Thread James Courtier-Dutton via Hampshire
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 12:09, rmluglist2--- via Hampshire wrote: > > Hi all > > I’ve been experiencing some network issues I’ve never seen before (in 20 > years of (admittedly home LAN) experience). One of my machines was showing > 8% packet loss when pinging the same site as another machine

Re: [Hampshire] 8% Packet loss due to ethernet cable

2021-03-04 Thread Joseph Bennie via Hampshire
Actually the issue is more likely naturally collisions on the network. I noted that you said ‘hub’ not ‘switch’. A switch has logic to balance all the traffic, like traffic lights (gross simplification). where as a hub is like all the lights are always green/ no lights at all, and you just

Re: [Hampshire] 8% Packet loss due to ethernet cable

2021-03-04 Thread Keith Edmunds via Hampshire
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:49:03 +, hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk said: > With cat6E you are also future > proofing a little as well as home routers and network interfaces improve. With the caveat that CAT6e is not a recognised standard, so there's no guarantee what you're getting. -- Linux Tips:

Re: [Hampshire] 8% Packet loss due to ethernet cable

2021-03-04 Thread Marc Loftus via Hampshire
Hi Rob Ethernet cables should have a quality rating on them. You may have been using a Cat 5 cable. Cat 5 have a certain bandwidth and can support 10 or 100 Mbps speed. Older cables may work depending on length and interference as you have experienced. Shielding is another concern. If the cable

Re: [Hampshire] 8% Packet loss due to ethernet cable

2021-03-04 Thread Nick Chalk via Hampshire
Hello Rob. On Thursday, 04 March, 2021, you wrote > One of my machines was showing 8% packet loss > when pinging the same site as another machine on > the same hub at the same time which was > reporting 0%. ... > What I find odd though is why not 0% or 100%? > Surely the wires inside the cable

Re: [Hampshire] 8% Packet loss due to ethernet cable

2021-03-04 Thread Brad Rogers via Hampshire
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:09:21 - rmluglist2--- via Hampshire wrote: Hello rmluglist2---, >a) the length of the cable or Unlikely; Cable runs of up to 100m should be okay. Difficult to reach in a domestic setting. >b) the quality of the cable or More likely. You also mentioned (lack of)

[Hampshire] 8% Packet loss due to ethernet cable

2021-03-04 Thread rmluglist2--- via Hampshire
Hi all I've been experiencing some network issues I've never seen before (in 20 years of (admittedly home LAN) experience). One of my machines was showing 8% packet loss when pinging the same site as another machine on the same hub at the same time which was reporting 0%. This proves it