because
they do a lot of regular short writes. To test this theory, try it with
a new USB flash stick.
HTH,
Chris.
--
Chris Simmonds 2net Limited
ch...@2net.co.uk http://www.2net.co.uk/
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https
just let me
know what you want to talk about and I will get it on the schedule [1]
Anton
[1] http://hants.lug.org.uk/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?6February2010
--
Chris Simmonds 2net Limited
ch...@2net.co.uk http://www.2net.co.uk/
--
Please post to: Hampshire
of
devices that have Linux inside them. The vast majority of people in this
country use Linux every single day, even if they don't realise it.
Bye for now,
Chris.
--
Chris Simmonds 2net Limited
ch...@2net.co.uk http://www.2net.co.uk/
--
Please post
with it. The N900 is an open platform and so
is hackable. The Others are nice phones, but apart from running
Andriod apps you can't do that much with them. Except use them as
phones, of course :-).
Chris.
--
Chris Simmonds 2net Limited
ch...@2net.co.uk http://www.2net.co.uk
own comments here) or Linux.
Which is the cheapest and most cross platform? Which one do you think
handset manufacturers will adopt?
Bye for now,
Chris Simmonds
[1] http://www.limofoundation.org/
[2] http://www.embedded-europe.com/220100741
--
Chris Simmonds 2net Limited
ch
Chris Dennis wrote:
Chris Simmonds wrote:
Final comment: whether it is Android or not, the future of mobile
devices is Linux. When you think about it, there are only a few
options: Symbian (only for Nokia - who seem to be moving towards Linux
anyhow - see the N900 and similar), Mac OS X
Alan Pope wrote:
2009/9/25 Chris Simmonds ch...@2net.co.uk:
Final comment: whether it is Android or not, the future of mobile
devices is Linux. When you think about it, there are only a few options:
Symbian (only for Nokia - who seem to be moving towards Linux anyhow -
see the N900
Adrian Bridgett wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 17:15:18 +0100 (+0100), Chris Simmonds wrote:
One option I have considered is using, say, MySQL with one master node
replicating to all the others and some mechanism to elect a new master
if the original went down. But, that sounds messy
Hugo Mills wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:13:45PM +0100, Chris Simmonds wrote:
Hi and thanks to everyone who replied. I'm busy researching some
possibilities at the moment. However, just to clarify, the issue is high
availability among the 50 or so nodes so that any node can go down
Hi,
I have a situation where I need to keep data on several PCs on a LAN in
sync. Any PC may update the data, with suitable locking, which must be
pushed out to all the others. It must be possible for a PC to go down
and be brought back on line again without impacting the others. The
amount
which of the caches is being added to.
Chris Simmonds
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
