On 03/10/09 11:16, Rob Malpass wrote:
Hi all
Can someone tell me please if what I'm trying to do is
overcomplicating things? I'm thinking of setting up some sort of
domain controller for the Linux part of my network i.e. to have my
own (and any other family member's) user area under a
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:16:39AM +0100, Rob Malpass wrote:
Can someone tell me please if what I'm trying to do is
overcomplicating things? I'm thinking of setting up some sort of
domain controller for the Linux part of my network i.e. to have my
own (and any other family member's) user area
Rob Malpass wrote:
Hi all
Can someone tell me please if what I'm trying to do is
overcomplicating things? I'm thinking of setting up some sort of
domain controller for the Linux part of my network i.e. to have my own
(and any other family member's) user area under a remote box as
On 03/10/09 13:12, Hugo Mills wrote:
(**) ActiveDirectory uses LDAP for authN, and Kerberos for authZ,
which is actually a better design than the common Unix configuration
of LDAP for both authN and authZ. One thing that MS did get
right... :)
pedant
well, technically, if authN ==
On Saturday 03 Oct 2009, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 11:16:39AM +0100, Rob Malpass wrote:
Can someone tell me please if what I'm trying to do is
overcomplicating things? I'm thinking of setting up some sort of
domain controller for the Linux part of my network i.e. to have my
So, a central fileserver combined with automount and centrally-stored
user accounts.
How many users / computers are we talking about here?
Are they all Linux boxes or are there some Windows systems too?
4 users and for the purposes of this - all will be running Linux. I can
move
