Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-06-01 Thread Tim Brocklehurst
With two drives you can double your storage, but halve you MTBF (mean tme between failure), or effectively double your MTBF for the original capacity (RAID 0 vs RAID1). LVM across two disks has essentially the same problem as RAID0 in this case. I would seriously think about 3 drives and RAID 5

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Freaky Clown
i can not recommend the Qnap Ts-412 NAS enough... small, takes 4 drives (i currently have 4x2TBs) with green drives its almost silent and powers down and uses very little energy its got a linux base and has ssh access and oodles of functions and services and its bloody cheap too! -- Please post

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Leo
I'm pleased with my Netgear Stora, but only as a result of OpenStora: http://www.openstora.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page Leo On 31/05/12 15:37, Rob Malpass wrote: Hi all Thanks for your replies. I think I'm going down the DIY route. On a related note, one thing I want to do is have all

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Alan Pope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31/05/12 11:39, Rob Malpass wrote: > I'm looking for a NAS device / media server - need a recommendation > please. > HP Microserver vote here. I have one with 8x2TB running btrfs and it's great. Of course you can start small with the disk that com

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Tony Whitmore
On 31.05.2012 13:30, Tony Whitmore wrote: On 31.05.2012 11:39, Rob Malpass wrote: So I guess my question is - why not build a machine myself instead of the microserver?   Quietness isn't much of an issue because it'll be in a room separate to the TV.   Are there any other considerations here?

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Tony Whitmore
On 31.05.2012 15:37, Rob Malpass wrote: On a related note, one thing I want to do is have all these files in one folder - which is impossible as they need to span across two physical drives. So what I have at present is: Physical Drive a: 1973-2001 Physical Drive b: 2002-2012 Is there a way

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Rob Malpass
Hi all Thanks for your replies. I think I'm going down the DIY route. On a related note, one thing I want to do is have all these files in one folder - which is impossible as they need to span across two physical drives. So what I have at present is: Physical Drive a: 1973-2001 Physical D

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Jan Henkins
On Thu, May 31, 2012 13:30, Tony Whitmore wrote: [snip] > The following spring to mind: > Power consumption (& therefore running cost) An "anecdotal" tick for HP (in the absence of power consumption data) > Physical space Good on that! > Availability of spares/replacements This is actually a

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Tony Whitmore
On 31.05.2012 11:39, Rob Malpass wrote: So I guess my question is - why not build a machine myself instead of the microserver?   Quietness isn't much of an issue because it'll be in a room separate to the TV.   Are there any other considerations here? The following spring to mind: Power consump

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Ally Biggs
I was tempted to get one of those hps myself I like the design of them is there a option to get one of units without microshite home server? Lowering the cost. Sent from my iPhone On 31 May 2012, at 12:11, "Jan Henkins" wrote: > Hello Rob, > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 11:39, Rob Malpass wrote: >

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Jan Henkins
Hello Rob, On Thu, May 31, 2012 11:39, Rob Malpass wrote: > Hi all > > I'm looking for a NAS device / media server - need a recommendation > please. > > 1) Needs to be able to store 4TB+ of data so presumably need at least 2 > drive bays. > > 2) Needs to be on 24/7 > > I was thinking (and this lis

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Philip Stubbs
On 31 May 2012 11:39, Rob Malpass wrote: > question is - why not build a machine myself instead of the microserver? > Quietness isn't much of an issue because it'll be in a room separate to the > TV.   Are there any other considerations here? power consumption speed space aesthetics reliability o

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Ally Biggs
Save the money and build it yourself freenas is they way to go. I had a old Pentium 3 server running over a year with no downtime loaded it up with a few decent sized SCSI drives happy days, Current got a dell power edge 800 running comes with a SATA controller so loaded up a few decent sized dr

Re: [Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread timb
I see no reason not to build it yourself. Depending on the criticality of your data you may wish to consider a RAID system, which you can do through Linux in software. You might like to look at some mini-itx motherboards that are around. Some are quite impressive. The case is likely to be the thing

[Hampshire] Recommendation please - Big NAS

2012-05-31 Thread Rob Malpass
Hi all I'm looking for a NAS device / media server - need a recommendation please. 1) Needs to be able to store 4TB+ of data so presumably need at least 2 drive bays. 2) Needs to be on 24/7 I was thinking (and this list has previously raved about) a HP microserver. However this gives m