On 16/05/2010 12:06, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Dee,
>
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:53:40PM +0100, Dee Earley wrote:
>> On 15/05/2010 20:12, Keith Edmunds wrote:
>>> Mail sent to you will have the mailbox it is sent to _somewhere_ in the
>>> headers (otherwise how do you suppose the mail gets to you?).
Hi Dee,
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 09:53:40PM +0100, Dee Earley wrote:
> On 15/05/2010 20:12, Keith Edmunds wrote:
> > Mail sent to you will have the mailbox it is sent to _somewhere_ in the
> > headers (otherwise how do you suppose the mail gets to you?).
>
> By using details that are not passed as
: <20100515201226.55a5c...@ws.in.tiger-computing.com>
In-Reply-To: <4beeb860.1010...@earlsoft.co.uk>
References: <032801caf417$09f49710$1dddc5...@myzen.co.uk>
<20100515131108.gx18...@bitfolk.com>
<4beeb860.1010...@earlsoft.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4
On Sat, 15 May 2010 16:06:08 +0100, d...@earlsoft.co.uk said:
> > Looking at the headers of mails you receive from the list should
> > usually tell you which email address the email was sent to.
>
> I was going to suggest that but checking mine, it was only my server
> that mentioned it in it'
On 15/05/2010 14:11, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:11:51AM +0100, Rob Malpass wrote:
>> test - sorry folks for wasting bandwidth. If anyone's interested, I have
>> several email addresses and I can't work out which one is in use so if this
>> gets through, it will pro
Hi Rob,
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:11:51AM +0100, Rob Malpass wrote:
> test - sorry folks for wasting bandwidth. If anyone's interested, I have
> several email addresses and I can't work out which one is in use so if this
> gets through, it will prove this one works.
Looking at the headers of m
test - sorry folks for wasting bandwidth. If anyone's interested, I have
several email addresses and I can't work out which one is in use so if this
gets through, it will prove this one works.
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/l
