Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:26:43PM +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> Here's an selinux policy for haproxy. The patch is built and lightly
> tested with haproxy-1.3.15.7-1.fc10.i386 on Fedora9, and haproxy-1.2.18
> on RHEL5.
believe it or not, I've never experimented at all with selinux. Ho
Raised the limit and restarted HAProxy. No down time or limit reaching, but
LbTot is still only about 15% of Total sessions. Any possible reason for
this?
2009/3/18 Sun Yijiang
> Backend servers were down about 2 hours during the 37 hour up time.
> Session limits have been reached for frontend
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 08:38:36AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> believe it or not, I've never experimented at all with selinux.
Yea, I wouldn't have guessed it, but you're doing a fine job developing
haproxy. I'm really impressed by it! So please keep your focus there :-)
> However,
> reading
Possibly a stupid question but:
Can Haproxy work as a TCP-multiplexer i.e. combine requests into one
connection to a server?
Or would that be related to using keep-alive?
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
Your ps output shows that syslogd is not running with the flags you've
defined in your rc.conf.
It's still running in secure ( -s ) mode. Also using "-b 127.0.0.1"
would likely be preferred over "-a 127.0.0.1/32"
James.
On Mar 11, 2009, at 1:39 AM, Weschmann Michael wrote:
Hi,
I found the
Are you using cookies to maintain client to server persistence?
James.
On Mar 19, 2009, at 1:16 AM, Sun Yijiang wrote:
Raised the limit and restarted HAProxy. No down time or limit
reaching, but LbTot is still only about 15% of Total sessions. Any
possible reason for this?
2009/3/18 Sun
All our backend servers share cookie info from one memcached server, so we
don't use HAProxy to handle any cookie stuff.
2009/3/20 James Satterfield
> Are you using cookies to maintain client to server persistence?
> James.
>
> On Mar 19, 2009, at 1:16 AM, Sun Yijiang wrote:
>
> Raised the limit
The client should be using a hash to determine which memcached to use
for a given key. You should not be attempting to load balance
memcached nodes.
See http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/FAQ#Cluster_Architecture_Questions
for explanations.
James.
On Mar 4, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Joseph H
I just recently upgraded my LBs to 1.3.15.8 from 1.2.something and
noticed those stats. I was wondering about them as well. In my setup
those numbers only seem to differ where I'm using cookies for
persistence.
James.
On Mar 19, 2009, at 10:35 PM, Sun Yijiang wrote:
All our backend server
9 matches
Mail list logo
