On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:41:53AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Thanks for your work on this. I have no way to test that the specfiles
> work, and I only update a few fields in them at each release. So it's
> really a good thing that someone like you checks them and proposes
> fixes.
Would you
Hi Eric,
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 09:06:40PM -0700, Eric Schwab wrote:
> We would like to use x-client with the SMTP protocol with haproxy, as a
> means to pass along some basic data to the backend SMTP servers. We
> looked into this a month or two ago and Willy mentioned that this would
> be s
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:56:07PM +0200, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:41:53AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your work on this. I have no way to test that the specfiles
> > work, and I only update a few fields in them at each release. So it's
> > really
Hey guys,
All of my Apaches are logging the load balancer's IP in the error log
for source IP. I have changed the LogFormat to use the X-Forwarded-For
header for the access log, but is there any way to get the correct IP in
the error log? Unless I'm missing something, there is no LogFormat for
Use mod_rpaf and apache will to REMOTE_HOST = X-Forwarded-for in all
its processings.
stderr.net/rpaf or something like that for the URL.
Patrick
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Will Buckner wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> All of my Apaches are logging the load balancer's IP in the error log for
> sour
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Now that the storm of horror stories has gone with release of 1.3.17,
> I'd like to explain what I'm planning to do for future versions of
> haproxy.
>
> Right now there are a few issues with the development process and
> the vers
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:57:26AM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Now that the storm of horror stories has gone with release of 1.3.17,
> > I'd like to explain what I'm planning to do for future versions of
> > haproxy.
>
Willy,
A while back we had discussed adding a control socket to haproxy to
take such actions are manually marking nodes as down, adding new
nodes, and other dynamic state changes.
Have you thought about this any further since this was last brought up?
Thanks,
Brian
--
- Brian Gupta
New York C
8 matches
Mail list logo