On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 10:20:23AM +0800, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
OK maybe use is OK in fact, considering the alternatives.
:) some proposals for the keywords:
for/use
condition/use
cond/use
(cond/use seems the best compromise - short, but understandable enough)
what would you
Hi Willy,
It seems right to implement it.
I'll review this with the team and let you know once we have an
available patch.
regards,
n.
On 04/04/2009, at 03:49, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:29:32PM -0300, Nicolas Cohen wrote:
hi,
i want to use haproxy to
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 11:43:38AM -0300, Nicolas Cohen wrote:
Hi Willy,
It seems right to implement it.
I'll review this with the team and let you know once we have an
available patch.
Nice, thanks!
Willy
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 07:46:28PM +0400, Alexey wrote:
Hi,
I saw post about delaying incoming smtp connections via haproxy. Looks like I
need transparent proxy for saving source ip addresses, but it requires TPROXY
in linux kernel.
yes it does.
I need to patch kernel + iptables
Hey guys,
I'm seeing an interesting thing with 1.3.x in my production
environment... I have my stats_uri defined as /proxy_http_stats,
requiring a username and password. When I access this URL, about half
the time I'm taken to a 404 page on my destination servers (haproxy
never catches the
5 matches
Mail list logo
