RE: Doesn't work for a very few visitors

2009-12-19 Thread John Lauro
Are you using connection tracking with iptables? If so, you might want to consider using a more basic configuration without connection tracking. What does your iptables configuration look like? From: Joe Torsitano [mailto:jtorsit...@weatherforyou.com] Sent: Saturday, December 19,

Check behavior

2009-12-19 Thread Alexey Lapitsky
Hi, I have multiple listen sections with the same backends: listen download.example.com :1 server download_passenger 127.0.0.1:8080 check maxconn 20 listen search.example.com :10001 server search_passenger 127.0.0.1:8080 check maxconn 2 Will haproxy independently check

Re: Doesn't work for a very few visitors

2009-12-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 05:14:42PM -0500, John Lauro wrote: Are you using connection tracking with iptables? If so, you might want to consider using a more basic configuration without connection tracking. Indeed! most likely you have a rule somewhere which does a REJECT on INVALID packets and

Re: Check behavior

2009-12-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 06:29:56AM +0300, Alexey Lapitsky wrote: Hi, I have multiple listen sections with the same backends: listen download.example.com :1 server download_passenger 127.0.0.1:8080 check maxconn 20 listen search.example.com :10001 server

Re: minimum requirements and explanation about stats

2009-12-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Gabriel, On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 02:13:12AM -0200, Gabriel Sosa wrote: Hola! Currently our haproxy is setup over a Intel Pentium D 930 with 2gb 667 RAM, we are in a test stage. Running a Centos 5.3 64bits kernel 2.6 haproxy was compiled with TARGET=linux26 - How can I know if this