RE: Doesn't work for a very few visitors

This was definitely not caused by too many connections or the conntrack table being full. In my test setup there were only five people trying to connect... two people who were having the problem and three of us that it worked fine for. Still the strange thing is the exact same iptables setup work

QoS policies/priorities when sharing web servers among frontends

Is there a way to configure haproxy so it deals with available backends ressources (number of active connexions) as "sharable quotas", a bit like Linux IP QoS can do for traffic shaping ? ie. do a best effort to attribute a minimum number of active cnx for a frontend when there are that much requ

Intel nehalem crc32 for URI hashing (and Keep-Alive)

Hey, Attached, and linked here: http://consoleninja.net/p/haproxy_intel_hash.diff ... is a patch to HAProxy 1.3.22 that uses intel's nehalem hardware CRC32 instruction for the URI hashing. I did some tests here: http://dormando.livejournal.com/522027.html With this bench tool: http://consoleninja

Re: Intel nehalem crc32 for URI hashing (and Keep-Alive)

> I did some tests here: > http://dormando.livejournal.com/522027.html > With this bench tool: > http://consoleninja.net/p/intel_hash_bench.c > ... which I hadn't even compiled with -O2 during my tests. For what it's worth, compiled with -O2: haproxy, without extra tests: 0m16.883s (though it wav

Multipart ACLs

I'm a little confused about multipart ACLs. Are conditions ORed or ANDed together as they're added on? For example, what should happen when I set up the following? acl my_cond hdr_dom(host) site1.com acl my_cond path_beg /special-case use_backend www2 if my_cond default_backend www1 Should my

Re: Multipart ACLs

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:26:43PM -0500, Ben Koski wrote: > I'm a little confused about multipart ACLs. Are conditions ORed or ANDed > together as they're added on? > > For example, what should happen when I set up the following? > > acl my_cond hdr_dom(host) site1.com > acl my_cond path_beg /s