Re: Throughput degradation after upgrading haproxy from 1.3.22 to 1.4.1

2010-03-15 Thread Erik Gulliksson
Hi Willy, Thanks for your elaborative answer. > Did you observe anything special about the CPU usage ? Was it lower > than with 1.3 ? If so, it would indicate some additional delay somewhere. > If it was higher, it could indicate that the Transfer-encoding parser > takes too many cycles but my pr

Re: Throughput degradation after upgrading haproxy from 1.3.22 to 1.4.1

2010-03-15 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Erik, On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:27:38AM +0100, Erik Gulliksson wrote: > Hi Willy, > > Thanks for your elaborative answer. > > > Did you observe anything special about the CPU usage ? Was it lower > > than with 1.3 ? If so, it would indicate some additional delay somewhere. > > If it was high

dynamic referer protecion

2010-03-15 Thread MikoĊ‚aj Radzewicz
Dear Sir, I have been using haproxy for a couple of weeks in some basic configuration. Since 2 weeks we have been suffering from some DoS attacks to our web servers which made them causes 500 due to extreamly high number of connections. All of them are caused through the referers - links(urls) to o

Re: dynamic referer protecion

2010-03-15 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 07:54:19PM +0100, Miko?aj Radzewicz wrote: > Dear Sir, > I have been using haproxy for a couple of weeks in some basic > configuration. Since 2 weeks we have been suffering from some DoS > attacks to our web servers which made them causes 500 due to extreamly > high num