[ANNOUNCE] haproxy 1.4.10

2010-11-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi all, we've got all the reported bugs fixed : - [BUG] debug: report the correct poller list in verbose mode - [BUG] capture: do not capture a cookie if there is no memory left - [BUG] appsession: fix possible double free in case of out of memory - [CRITICAL] cookies: mixing cookies in in

Re: Stats questions

2010-11-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Dmitri, On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 04:02:38PM -0800, Dmitri Smirnov wrote: > I am attaching a fragment of stats page from one of my instances running > 1.4.8 released on 2010/06/16 > > > Problem 1. Under the Queue section all of the servers had some non-zero > queue at one point in time since

Re: Feature Requests: march native and cwnd setting param

2010-11-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Hank, On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 06:56:34AM -0800, Hank A. Paulson wrote: > 1 - With recent CPUs Intel 5300/5400/5500/5600 and AMD 6100 the set of > optimal compiler settings for optimizations :) is not something anyone can > keep up with - not to mention different versions of gcc that understan

Re: bug? reqidel and pcre

2010-11-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:31:49AM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote: > Le dimanche 28 novembre 2010 10:39:49, Hank A. Paulson a écrit : > > Looks good in my limited test cases, headers are gone regardless of > > ordering of del statements, but in your notes: > > I've also replayed the tests I made on frid

Re: bug? reqidel and pcre

2010-11-28 Thread Cyril Bonté
Le dimanche 28 novembre 2010 10:39:49, Hank A. Paulson a écrit : > Looks good in my limited test cases, headers are gone regardless of > ordering of del statements, but in your notes: I've also replayed the tests I made on friday and all of them are now OK with the patch. -- Cyril Bonté

Re: bug? reqidel and pcre

2010-11-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:39:49AM -0800, Hank A. Paulson wrote: > Looks good in my limited test cases, headers are gone regardless of > ordering of del statements, but in your notes: > > "but since headers were the last header processing, the issue > remained unnoticed." > > You mean "cookies w

Re: bug? reqidel and pcre

2010-11-28 Thread Hank A. Paulson
Looks good in my limited test cases, headers are gone regardless of ordering of del statements, but in your notes: "but since headers were the last header processing, the issue remained unnoticed." You mean "cookies were the last", right? On 11/27/10 10:14 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi Cyril an