On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:10:01PM +, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hi,
I've got two identical web servers physically close and on the same subnet,
one of them shows a significantly higher number of server chk's (5320)
On 01.12.2010 21:55, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote:
On 2010-11-11 12:59, Gerd Müller wrote:
Hi Krzystof,
thank you for your the net-snmp plugin for haproxy. It's a great help.
Since I am using OpenNMS I had to make small patch. OIDs for frontends
and backends end with .0 wheres the actual instance
Thanks Willy
I prodded my hosts and they fixed it at their end.
Regards
Richard
On 2 Dec 2010, at 06:54, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:10:01PM +, Richard Shaw wrote:
Hi,
I've got two identical web servers physically close and on the same
Version en ligne de ce message:
http://newsletter.ueuz.com/svi/miroir.php?bat=optout_solumail_ctrm
Cher internaute,
Lors de votre inscription sur le site solumail ou un de ses sites partenaires,
vous avez manifesté le souhait de recevoir des offres preferentielles
correspondant à vos besoins
On 2010-12-02 10:03, Gerd Müller wrote:
On 01.12.2010 21:55, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote:
On 2010-11-11 12:59, Gerd Müller wrote:
Hi Krzystof,
thank you for your the net-snmp plugin for haproxy. It's a great help.
Since I am using OpenNMS I had to make small patch. OIDs for frontends
and backends
Hi,
I dug around a bit and couldn't figure this out and was hoping you guys
could point me in the right direction.
I've got a server running like this (verson 1.13, condensed version):
*frontend http *:80*
* grace 1 # don't kill for 10 seconds*
* mode http*
* acl badhost_src src
List,
I am attempting to enable the disable-on-404 option on only the backends that
other backends track. It seems that the secondary backends do not like this and
error out saying it is inconsistent even if disable-on-404 is only enabled in
the backend that they track. Is it possible to have
On Dec 2, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote:
On 2010-12-02 21:28, Joe Williams wrote:
List,
I am attempting to enable the disable-on-404 option on only the
backends that other backends track. It seems that the secondary
backends do not like this and error out saying it is
Hi folks.
For our company's convenience, we prefer to have our HAProxy unit
script also allow us to talk to the stats socket. We also do a couple
other things, like show connections with a status argument. Perhaps
you can use it too.
Code and readme here: https://github.com/flores/haproxyctl
A
9 matches
Mail list logo