Hi Vincent,
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 07:31:16AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> I have tried with 82599 and got no performance improvements at all (they
> were plugged on 1G ports).
As I've never used a 10G NIC on a 1G port, I have no idea whether it's
normal or not to see no improvement.
> I hav
Hi Willy!
I don't answer at everything but I have read carefully what you
said. Thanks for such precise tips.
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mardi 10 mai 2011, vers 00:31, Willy
Tarreau disait :
>> I will also test with a 10G NIC next week. However, with such small
>> objects
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:03:15AM +0300, Lauri-Alo Adamson wrote:
> Hello again !
>
> Many thanks for your answers ! I would be very pleased of snapshot. I
> would try to be more patience .
> I would try both - the haproxy older developer versioon and the the new
> developer versio
Hello again !
Many thanks for your answers ! I would be very pleased of snapshot. I
would try to be more patience .
I would try both - the haproxy older developer versioon and the the new
developer version with patch.
Lauri-Alo Adamson
AS Andmevara
-Original Mess
Hi Vincent,
seems like I forgot to reply to this one.
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 07:32:39PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> >> With this configuration, I get 10 000 HTTP req/s. The haproxy process
> >> takes 100% CPU.
>
> > it's important to check how it translates into user and system usage.
>
>
Hello,
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 05:40:44PM +0200, bartavelle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This doesn't seem to work with 1.5-dev6 with accept-proxy bindings :
> http://tehlose.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/fun-stuff-with-latest-haproxy-version/
>
> The stick table only contains a single key - 127.0
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 08:13:43PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 9 mai 2011 07:41:50, Lauri-Alo Adamson a écrit :
> > Hello!
> >
> > Anyone has not answered yet for my e-mail its sad ! Is there some kind
> > of haproxy developer mailing list where the development versions are
> > s
Hi Cyril,
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 08:44:54PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> As reported by Lauri-Alo Adamson, version 1.5-dev6 doesn't support
> stick-tables with a binary type.
> This issue was introduced in the commit 4f92d32 where a line was erroneously
> deleted, and is 1.5-specific.
Patch appli
As reported by Lauri-Alo Adamson, version 1.5-dev6 doesn't support
stick-tables with a binary type.
This issue was introduced in the commit 4f92d32 where a line was erroneously
deleted, and is 1.5-specific.
---
src/stick_table.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --gi
Hi,
Le lundi 9 mai 2011 07:41:50, Lauri-Alo Adamson a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> Anyone has not answered yet for my e-mail its sad ! Is there some kind
> of haproxy developer mailing list where the development versions are
> subject of disscussion.
Oh yes, it was 1 month ago.
> I have configured a Ci
Hello,
This doesn't seem to work with 1.5-dev6 with accept-proxy bindings :
http://tehlose.wordpress.com/2010/12/15/fun-stuff-with-latest-haproxy-version/
The stick table only contains a single key - 127.0.0.1 :
# table: distribution, type: ip, size:512000, used:1
0x125e114: key=
Hi
Where can I find - or who can be so kind as to provide me with - the
X-Forwarded-For and listen queue patches for stunnel 4.36?
I can only locate patches for 4.34, but that's an 8 month old version by now,
and since stunnel versions 4.35 and 4.36 fixed both a file descriptor leak and
a memo
12 matches
Mail list logo
