Dear Reader,
We at Global Outsourcing Association of Lawyers invite you to
participate in our very powerful LPO Master Class led by Deepak
Malhotra, Chief Legal Officer & Global Counsel at Fusion Universal, UK.
Date: 25 April 2012
Time: 9:00 am PDT/12:00 pm EDT (100-120 minutes)
Topic: LPO Busine
Sorry for i'm new in haproxy,there is my problem
i wanna haproxy to proxy any non-http traffic.
And there is my config about it
listen tcp-in
bind 192.168.137.18:
mode tcp
tcp-request inspect-delay 5s
tcp-request content accept if HTTP
Hello,
I am observing some strange behaviour with haproxy and logging on Ubuntu
Oneiric.
haproxy is setup to log to /dev/log and logs successfully appear in
/var/log/syslog (via rsyslog).
Well, some of them do. Some just don't.
If I look on the servers we are proxying/load balancing I can see
Hi,
How important is it to assign a specific NIC to the single haproxy vm
with physical passthrough?
Best regards
Sebastian
On 16.04.2012 07:01, Baptiste wrote:
Hey,
You have to reserve resources for the VM.
FYI, At exceliance, we were able to go up to 55K rps in a VM on a core i7.
You'll
Hi,
I'm trying to build a small size loadbalancing maschine which fit's into
a small 19" rackmountable case.
Are there any experiences which some specific hardware, for example ATOM
boards or something similiar?
Can someone recomment anything special?
Best regards
Sebastian
Hi Team,
Configured HAProxy for bunch of web servers. It was working smoothly until
one fine day I found that on the server where haproxy is running memory
utilisation is getting high everyday. Biggest chunk in the memory
consumption is in slab_cache which is utilising 90% to 95% of total memory.
On 29/04/2012 20:01, Willy Tarreau wrote:
What I could suggest would be :
- reduce /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_time_wait to 30s
- increase /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_max to 524288 conns.
- increase hashsize to 131072 buckets.
This will help you support
> Note however that you will no longer be able to carry out any
> connection tracking logic on matched packes, including no NAT,
> syncookie protection, etc.
Are you sure syncookie protection doesn't work with "-j NOTRACK"? I don't
believe syncookie has anything to do with conntrack at all, i
Hi,
We want to perform LB, SSL termination and L7 on HAProxy. Could you please
advise the best approach for it? We are interested in max performance and not
complicated configuration.
If you are already running such configuration, pls share what is the max
connection rate you reach.
--
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 03:40:58PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
>
> > Note however that you will no longer be able to carry out any
> > connection tracking logic on matched packes, including no NAT,
> > syncookie protection, etc.
>
> Are you sure syncookie protection doesn't work with "-j NOTRAC
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Alexander Kamardash
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We want to perform LB, SSL termination and L7 on HAProxy. Could you please
> advise the best approach for it? We are interested in max performance and
> not complicated configuration.
>
> If you are already running such confi
Hey,
If you really need to do that for performance purpose, then you should
dedicate a server to your LB...
cheers
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Sebastian Fohler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How important is it to assign a specific NIC to the single haproxy vm with
> physical passthrough?
>
> Best regar
Hi,
You should enable "http-server-close" option in both frontend and
backend or in defaults section.
Otherwise, the first request is the only logged (tunnel mode).
cheers
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Peter Gillard-Moss
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am observing some strange behaviour with haproxy
Hi,
Currently, you can only do this based on source IP address.
I know Willy is working to improve this and in1.5-dev9 you'll be able
to do it, since you'll be able to track any users using strings (ie
your token) then apply conn_rate or sess_rate, http_req_rate, etc...
using gpc0 as a trigger.
c
Hi,
There s a "timeout check" you can try to play with, as well as the
classical options like inter, rise and fall.
cheers
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Igor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sometimes, some backend servers' link quality become very poor ( test by
> wget a test file from server),
> they look
Hi,
As far as I know, never. :)
On the other hand, HTTP 2.0 may be integrated asap as soon as proposed by IETF.
cheers
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Joe Stein wrote:
> Hi, I was wondering if/when SPDY support might be added to HAPROXY?
>
> Thanks!
>
> /*
> Joe Stein, 973-944-0094
> http://ww
A fairly easy configuration is to have Pound SSL sitting in front of
HAProxy. I don't have benchmark numbers, but the configuration is fairly
simple:
Pound:443 -> Haproxy:80 (or really any tcp port that haproxy is listening
on)
Here's most of my pound.cfg file:
ListenHTTPS
Address 0.0.0.0
Po
Hi,
I am pretty sure that termination traffic on Pound, Apache or Nginx will do a
work. My question is more about performance of such solution. It will eb a
entrance point and I don't want to create a single point of failure. In case of
splitting it to 2 LB layers HAProxy-> SSL termination->bac
18 matches
Mail list logo