Re: SSL handshake failure

2013-02-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:27:31PM +0400, Samat Galimov wrote: > You are right. > After I start haproxy with patch it establishes first connection normally, > as it should. > All following connections are randomly dropping an error as before. OK, so maybe there are still some places where the chan

Re: SSL handshake failure

2013-02-08 Thread Samat Galimov
You are right. After I start haproxy with patch it establishes first connection normally, as it should. All following connections are randomly dropping an error as before. On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:22:37PM +0400, Samat Galimov wrote: > >

[PATCH 3/3] MEDIUM: add systemd service

2013-02-08 Thread Marc-Antoine Perennou
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou --- .gitignore | 1 + Makefile | 8 ++-- contrib/systemd/haproxy.service.in | 11 +++ 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 contrib/systemd/haproxy.service.in diff

[PATCH 1/3] MEDIUM: New cli option -Ds for systemd compatibility

2013-02-08 Thread Marc-Antoine Perennou
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou --- doc/haproxy-en.txt | 1 + doc/haproxy-fr.txt | 1 + doc/haproxy.1 | 4 include/types/global.h | 1 + src/haproxy.c | 35 +++ 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a

HAProxy and systemd compatibility

2013-02-08 Thread Marc-Antoine Perennou
Hi, Currently, to reload haproxy configuration, you have to use "-sf". Systemd philosophy is for the daemon not to fork by themselves, but rather let the init process do it for them. My first patch adds a new option "-Ds" which is exactly like "-D", but instead of forking n times to get n jobs

[PATCH 2/3] MEDIUM: add haproxy-systemd-wrapper

2013-02-08 Thread Marc-Antoine Perennou
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou --- .gitignore| 1 + Makefile | 16 +- src/haproxy-systemd-wrapper.c | 122 ++ 3 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/haproxy-systemd-wr