Hi Lukas,
Thanks for replying.
Below the information:
HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev22-1a34d57 2014/02/03
Copyright 2000-2014 Willy Tarreau
Build options :
TARGET = linux2628
CPU = generic
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4
-Wformat -Werror=format-s
Hi,
> backend b_catchall
> log global
> mode http
> option httplog
> option http-server-close
>
> #--- speedtest
> use-server www.speedtest.net if { hdr_dom(host) -i speedtest }
> server www.speedtest.net *:80
This is an unsupported configuration, you cannot specify an asterisk
as address.
Thi
Thanks Lukas. But why does it say this here for "server" in the man?
Address “0.0.0.0″ or “*” has a special meaning.
It indicates that the connection will be forwarded to the same IP
address as the one from the client connection. This is useful in
transparent proxy architectures where the client’s
Hi,
> Thanks Lukas. But why does it say this here for "server" in the man?
>
> Address “0.0.0.0″ or “*” has a special meaning.
> It indicates that the connection will be forwarded to the same IP
> address as the one from the client connection. This is useful in
> transparent proxy architectures w
I understand. Is this something that could be taken up for a future version?
Also, what maxconn value do you recommend?
Thanks
On 5 March 2014 16:11, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> Thanks Lukas. But why does it say this here for "server" in the man?
>>
>> Address “0.0.0.0″ or “*” has a specia
Hi Willy,
> Chris Allen and Jeff Zellner reported a similar issue at the same
> time on two different versions : 1.4.20 and 1.5-dev17. The symptom
> is always the same, haproxy suddenly started to crash under load
> while it did not in the past.
>
> When looking deeper into the traces and core fi
Hi Neil,
I tried something similar, by putting the servername and setting
UseCanonicalName On...
but what i observe is that when i access my website with just xx.com in the
browser, it directs to https://www.xx.com
but if i start fresh and access my website with www.xx.com and the next
subseque
It’s possible to redirect this www.domain.com/demo(.*) to demo.domain.com\1
without using url_beg for each case?
Thanks
Hi,
> I understand. Is this something that could be taken up for a
> future version?
Not a trivial thing todo. I think an internal resolver implementation
in haproxy would be needed, as gethostbyname() and friends are blocking
(nginx has its own resolver for example).
I don't think there are us
so after looking at haproxy logs i noticed 2 things
if i type www.xx.com there is 1 log entry
haproxy[26387]: xx.11.11.118:62704 [05/Mar/2014:22:48:02.264] http-in
if-https/if1-app 10734/0/0/403/11137 200 10448 - - --VN 20/20/3/1/0 0/0 "GET /
HTTP/1.1"
but when i type xx.com i see 2 log entri
Hi Finn Arne,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:17:24PM +0100, Finn Arne Gangstad wrote:
> Slowly upgrading some load balancers with the latest snapshots, and we get
> a lot of CL entries in our logs, this caused some people to get a bit
> scared.
>
> Typical tcp dump:
>
> 13:58:55.161381 IP x.x.x.x.39
Hi Malcolm,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 08:43:47PM +, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Exactly right, but it is a common misunderstanding.
>
> Out of interest, How hard would it be to get a least connection
> scheduler to take account of cumulated connections?
It also uses them slightly bec
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 01:54:52PM +0100, Baptiste wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> You can't do this in current HAProxy.
> That said, it may happen soon, since the you can already use some
> header values in the http-request rules:
> IE:
> http-request redirect code 301 location www.%[hdr(host)]%[req.uri
Hi Lukas,
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 07:38:42PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
>
> > Chris Allen and Jeff Zellner reported a similar issue at the same
> > time on two different versions : 1.4.20 and 1.5-dev17. The symptom
> > is always the same, haproxy suddenly started to crash under loa
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:31:33AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > I understand. Is this something that could be taken up for a
> > future version?
>
> Not a trivial thing todo. I think an internal resolver implementation
> in haproxy would be needed, as gethostbyname() and friends
Hello Alexey,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:27:42PM +0700, Alexey Medvedchikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm maintain postgresql cluster with streaming replication for php-based
> webapp. And for a few days I'm trying to get rid of errors in my setup:
>
>Application serverDB server
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
