Can haproxy sync configuration to another instance for configuration updates?

Hi,all I want to deploy keepalived + haproxy to supply one high availability cluster with master-slave mode. But I am anxious about whether the configuration updates made in the master node can sync to the slave. Any suggestiones will be appreciated. Looking forward to your reply. Thank

Re: Application Persistence with WebSockets

Hi Ryan, On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:11:39PM -0500, Ryan Brock wrote: Willy, I tested these changes in my environment and it all works. So you may move forward with these changes. Great, thanks for the feedback! I really appreciate the help. You're welcome :-) Best regards, Willy

Re: Access backend vía proxy

Hi all, Sorry for the last email. I sent it empty. I would like to know it is possible to configure haproxy to forward the requests to a backend via proxy? Something like the following: backend api_backend *set_proxy http:proxy1:8080* server server1server1:8080 Using

Access backend vía proxy

Hi all, Is is possible

MariaDB 5.5.39 + HAProxy v1.5.3

Hello list, This is my first post. I checked a bit online to find a solution to my problem, but it seems that not many people are having the same issues. I use a very simple loadbalancing between two synchronized (Galera) MariaDB nodes. Here is the HAProxy config file : SNIP

MariaDB 5.5.39 + HAProxy v1.5.3

Hello list, This is my first post. I checked a bit online to find a solution to my problem, but it seems that not many people are having the same issues. I use a very simple loadbalancing between two synchronized (Galera) MariaDB nodes. Here is the HAProxy config file : SNIP

Re: MariaDB 5.5.39 + HAProxy v1.5.3

Wow. First post, first mistake, I hit the button twice after having corrected. Sorry, *this* is the current config I have problems with. Le 16/09/2014 15:48, Hoggins! a écrit : Hello list, This is my first post. I checked a bit online to find a solution to my problem, but it seems that not

Re: MariaDB 5.5.39 + HAProxy v1.5.3

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Hoggins! fucks...@wheres5.com wrote: Wow. First post, first mistake, I hit the button twice after having corrected. Sorry, *this* is the current config I have problems with. Le 16/09/2014 15:48, Hoggins! a écrit : Hello list, This is my first post. I

Boostez votre emailing avec les dernières nouveautés SendinBlue

Optimisez la d�livrabilit� de vos emails ! � [Voir dans votre navigateur](http://r.a.d.mailin.fr/fov6vkr71zr6uvf.html) � �[ ](http://r.a.d.mailin.fr/1qrgrib0s7yzb6uvd.html)� � Bonjour � tous, � L'�t� a �t� pluvieux, mais studieux chez SendinBlue :) Nous en avons profit�

Re: MariaDB 5.5.39 + HAProxy v1.5.3

Hi, Le 16/09/2014 15:52, Hoggins! a écrit : (...) defaults timeout connect 5000 timeout server 5 timeout client 5 (...) If I issue the same command after a few seconds, here is what I get : MariaDB [(none)] show variables like '%wsrep_node_name%'; ERROR 2006

Re: Can haproxy sync configuration to another instance for configuration updates?

There is nothing to be anxious about because there is no support in haproxy or keepalived for synchronization of configuration files -- it's something you'll need to handle using whatever node configuration tools you wish (puppet, chef, scripts, etc). On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Zebra

Re: MariaDB 5.5.39 + HAProxy v1.5.3

Hello Cyril, Le 16/09/2014 18:54, Cyril Bonté a écrit : Hi, Le 16/09/2014 15:52, Hoggins! a écrit : (...) defaults timeout connect 5000 timeout server 5 timeout client 5 (...) If I issue the same command after a few seconds, here is what I get :

Re: 回复： About the health check

Hi Zebra, I think it stops after the 3way because your configuration is not using any send/expect values, so after the connection is made its immediately done 'checking' the layer 7 part.. Something like this would be the proper way to use tcp-check: |option tcp-check tcp-check send

回复： Can haproxy sync configuration to another instance forconfiguration updates?

I got it.Thank you very much! -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: Bryan Talbot; 发送时间: 2014年9月17日(星期三) 凌晨1:31 收件人: Zebra; 抄送: haproxy; 主题: Re: Can haproxy sync configuration to another instance forconfiguration updates? There is nothing to be anxious about because there is

回复： Can I add one new server without stop the haproxy process?

I got it. Thank you very much! -- 原始邮件 -- 发件人: Juho Mäkinen; 发送时间: 2014年9月15日(星期一) 中午1:49 收件人: Zebra; 抄送: haproxy; 主题: Re: Can I add one new server without stop the haproxy process? You can't. The socket admin interface allows you to only disable existing

Re: 回复： About the health check

Hi,PiBa-NL Have you tried removing that 'option tcp-check' from your configuration like i wrote before.? It should then default to a simple layer4 3way. It is indeed as what you say. Thank you for your candid reply, and I gain a lot. Greatly appreciated. Kind regards. Zebra