Hi, all
In recent haproxy 1.5 git repository,
segmentation fault was occurred.
As below,
# gdb haproxy core.11536
GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux (7.2-64.el6_5.2)
(gdb) bt
#0 propagate_processes (from=0x36eb9906a8, to=0x144) at src/cfgparse.c:5958
#1 0x00413c56 in propagate_p
Hi Aleks,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:18:35AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi willy.
>
> If I can help feel free to write how.
Thanks, but that's not trivial at all. Basically I want zero FP,
I don't want users to have to resubscribe and I don't want to
filter based on subscriptions.
However
Dear Sirs,
Hope this email finds you well.
Just a quick reminder that that £225 early bird discount expiring next week
Tuesday, 15th April 2014 for our Biochemicals and Bioplastics 2014, 10th & 11th
June, Düsseldorf, Germany, please let me know how many people will be joining
us as soon as pos
Hi,
I'm running haproxy01 and trying to make this new map feature work, but
I get this error:
[ALERT] 261/141604 (29621) : Proxy 'cachebackend': unable to find
required use_backend:
'bk_%[hdr(host),map(/etc/haproxy/haproxy-backends.map)]'.
My config is:
frontend cachebackend
bind 127.0.0.1:80
dooh.. point to correct file and things work.. :)
Klavs Klavsen said the following on 09/19/2014 02:18 PM:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running haproxy01 and trying to make this new map feature work, but
> I get this error:
>
> [ALERT] 261/141604 (29621) : Proxy 'cachebackend': unable to find
> required use_ba
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
> dooh.. point to correct file and things work.. :)
>
Hi,
I like your config :)
Baptiste
Hi,
On 19.09.2014 15:12, Baptiste wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
>> dooh.. point to correct file and things work.. :)
>>
> Hi,
>
> I like your config :)
>
> Baptiste
>
>
Maybe this is somewhat better
--
use_backend
bk_%[hdr(host),lower,map(/etc/haproxy/hap
Thomas Heil said the following on 09/19/2014 03:15 PM:
[CUT]
> Maybe this is somewhat better
> --
> use_backend
> bk_%[hdr(host),lower,map(/etc/haproxy/haproxy-backends.map)] if TRUE
> --
> because its case insensitive about the hostname.
>
Thank you for that very valuable tip.. :)
--
Hi,
I just configured the load-balacing for systems that are yet to be
installed yet according to the tcp-check of haproxy these systems are
all available. This is the backend config I'm using right now:
backend back-api
bind-process 1
option tcp-check
mode http
balance roundrobin
Hi Dennis,
option tcp-check << that requires more send/expect options to actually perform
L7 checks.
For a simple L4 check remove the line completely or add : tcp-check connect
You might also want to look at option httpchk. Which is more friendly for basic
http checks.
Greets PiBa-NL
Dennis
Hi,
indeed after removing the option tcp-check line the checks now work as
expected. Thanks for the pointer.
Regards,
Dennis
On 19.09.2014 20:02, PiBa-NL wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> option tcp-check << that requires more send/expect options to actually
> perform L7 checks.
> For a simple L4 check
>
> Please don't forget to Cc the ML, unless there are private information
> in your email.
>
Oh, sorry. I missed that.
> 'peer' section is also used to synchronize data between HAProxy
> processes, when HAProxy is reloaded.
> You should use it. create a 'peer' section and don't forget to use th
View the Online page
http://www.naf-emarketing.net/ads/naf_constructions/ads001.htm
Share it in your Facebook ... Click here .
نـاف للإسكان و التعمير
للبيع
شقق جديدة و مستعملة
أراضي بمساحات و أماكن مختلفة
شقق سكنية للبيع - بناء جديد .
- المساحة: 130 متر مربع.
- 3 غرف نوم ( غرفة ماستر ).
- 3 حم
13 matches
Mail list logo
