Boss Capital

Hi there, My name is Harrison and I have personally been working with Boss Capital Trading for quite some time. They are very well reviewed online and have excellent customer service. If you are interested in becoming a binary trader please click the following link to start trading today! It is

BEM Enceintes connectées FRANCE CHEVAL Couvertures cheveaux

Version en ligne Ajouter nous à votre carnet d’adresses LA KOURSE AUX BONS PLANS GRAND JEU Inscrivez-vous Jusqu'au 8 Décembre Doublez vos Chances : Likez nous Vente du Samedi 29 Novembre Enceintes connectées Jusqu'à -50% à partir de 129,50€Jusqu'à -50%Durée : 48H Couvertur

Re: Better understanding of nbproc vs distributing interrupts for cpu load management

Hi Lukas, On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 05:19:31PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > I hope that one day we can move the SSL handshake to dedicated threads, > completely eliminating the event loop blocking and allowing a single > process to forward all the traffic while some parallel threads do all > the hea

Re: rewritting headers on the fly using CORS

Hi Charles, On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:09:05PM +0100, Charles Bijon wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if when using the header rewrite for CORS if > > - we can simplify keeping the origin in a variable on the fly and of > course with a list of acl for accept this domain > or > - that one is forced to u

Re: and response header based on presence of request header

Hi, On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 04:00:15PM +0100, Baptiste wrote: > This is not doable yet in HAProxy. > Inbound and outbound traffic are uncorrelated from each other. > It means once the request has been forwarded to the server, HAProxy > don't have it anymore, so it can't match it once the response

RE: Better understanding of nbproc vs distributing interrupts for cpu load management

Hi, > you're right. > If you need to scale *a lot* your SSL processing capacity in HAProxy, > you must use multiple processes. > That said, multiproc model has some counter parts (stats, server > status, health checks are local to each process, stick-tables can't be > synchronized, etc..). > With

Re: rewritting headers on the fly using CORS

Le 28/11/2014 16:13, Baptiste a écrit : On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Charles Bijon wrote: Hi, I wonder if when using the header rewrite for CORS if - we can simplify keeping the origin in a variable on the fly and of course with a list of acl for accept this domain or - that one is forced

Re: rewritting headers on the fly using CORS

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Charles Bijon wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if when using the header rewrite for CORS if > > - we can simplify keeping the origin in a variable on the fly and of course > with a list of acl for accept this domain > or > - that one is forced to use a different backend t

Re: and response header based on presence of request header

Please read: capture request header LBBEBUG len 5 http-response set-header LBNODENAME if { capture.req.hdr(2) -i true } instead of ugly X-Blah and X-Found Baptiste

Re: and response header based on presence of request header

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > > Hi, > > I want HAProxy to add a response header if request includes a specific > header. I implemented the logic [1] but I get the following > > parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:77] : acl 'lb_debug' will never match > because it only in

rewritting headers on the fly using CORS

Hi, I wonder if when using the header rewrite for CORS if - we can simplify keeping the origin in a variable on the fly and of course with a list of acl for accept this domain or - that one is forced to use a different backend to each domain. example: in the backend using : rspadd Access-Co

add response header based on presence of request header

Hi, I want HAProxy to add a response header if request includes a specific header. I implemented the logic [1] but I get the following parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:77] : acl 'lb_debug' will never match because it only involves keywords that are incompatible with 'frontend http-response head

and response header based on presence of request header

Hi, I want HAProxy to add a response header if request includes a specific header. I implemented the logic [1] but I get the following parsing [/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:77] : acl 'lb_debug' will never match because it only involves keywords that are incompatible with 'frontend http-response head

Re: Better understanding of nbproc vs distributing interrupts for cpu load management

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > On 25/11/2014 07:08 μμ, Lukas Tribus wrote: >>> Hi, > > Thanks for your reply. We have tried this approach and while >> it gives > some benefit, the haproxy process itself > remains cpu-bound, >> with no idle time at all - with both pidstat

Re: termination state "SQ"

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Daniel Lieberman wrote: > We're managing a fairly high-traffic site and we're seeing a lot of HTTP 503s > with termination state SQ. I'm trying to figure out what this means, since Q > indicates that we're still in the queue (in the server-specific queue in our