Hi,
We recently upgraded from a 18 month-old pre-release version of haproxy 1.5
to haproxy 1.5.9, and our sticky session functionality has broken.
Specifically, our application needs to direct groups of users to specific
servers based on certain user characteristics. The way this works is that
> Le 22/12/2014 19:00, Lukas Tribus a écrit :
>>> OK, got it.
>>>
>>> What should I do with HAProxy to handle with them? (option
>>> accept-invalid-http-request is set already)
>>
>> You can't. HAproxy will not support those URI's.
>>
>> accept-invalid-http-request allows a limited set of forbidden
Hi Juriy and Lukas,
while scrolling into the code, I hit a part of code which reminded me
this thread.
Le 22/12/2014 19:00, Lukas Tribus a écrit :
OK, got it.
What should I do with HAProxy to handle with them? (option
accept-invalid-http-request is set already)
You can't. HAproxy will not
Hi Pavlos,
Le 06/01/2015 20:17, Pavlos Parissis a écrit :
Hi,
According to the docs I can have the following snippet
http-request add-header Nodename %[env(HOSTNAME)]
to set the hostname as the value on a header. But, it doesn't work. I
network trace and Nginx logs show no value.
Please ens
Hi,
According to the docs I can have the following snippet
http-request add-header Nodename %[env(HOSTNAME)]
to set the hostname as the value on a header. But, it doesn't work. I
network trace and Nginx logs show no value.
While the following works.
http-request add-header Nodename %H
I am usi
Hi,
How do I do:
acl REQUEST_TOO_BIG hdr_val(content-length) gt 2
http-request add-header X-Haproxy-TARPIT
%[req.fhdr(X-Haproxy-TARPIT,-1)]request-too-big, if METH_POST
REQUEST_TOO_BIG
and then later
capture request header X-Haproxy-TARPIT len 256
So that it's added to the log? I'm running
Hi folks,
there are some API changes (most structures will became opaque)
in OpenSSL that will break the build with haproxy. It appears
that we will see a 1.1.0 release with those changes by the end
of 2015 [1].
Some of this can be reproduced by linking haproxy against current
openssl ma
Could you possibly tag the 1.5.10 release in git?
Our CI/CD process relies on tags to build new releases :-)
--
Erik Weber
8 matches
Mail list logo