RE: [SPAM] jBoss thread count issue while upgrading from 1.5dev21 to 1.5.11

Hi Sarvesh, Dear Team,    We upgraded my haproxy from 1.5dev21 to 1.5.11 stable version with same  configuration. At the backend, we are using jBoss.  As soon as we upgraded, we encountered serious issue regarding jBoss  thread counts. It has been increased tremendously.  After rollback to

Re: [SPAM] jBoss thread count issue while upgrading from 1.5dev21 to 1.5.11

Hi Lukas, On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 02:55:32PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: Hi Sarvesh, Dear Team,    We upgraded my haproxy from 1.5dev21 to 1.5.11 stable version with same  configuration. At the backend, we are using jBoss.  As soon as we upgraded, we encountered serious issue

rewrite header http:// to https://

Hello, I’m trying to rewrite the HTTP header, rewriting http to https. Using the following article http://blog.haproxy.com/2013/02/26/ssl-offloading-impact-on-web-applications/ http://blog.haproxy.com/2013/02/26/ssl-offloading-impact-on-web-applications/ . I have the following configuration:

[SPAM] jBoss thread count issue while upgrading from 1.5dev21 to 1.5.11

Dear Team, We upgraded myhaproxyfrom 1.5dev21 to 1.5.11 stable version with same configuration. At the backend, we are using jBoss. As soon as we upgraded, we encountered serious issue regarding jBoss thread counts. It has been increased tremendously. After rollback to 1.5dev21, everything

using a fetcher in wrong context, performance tip

Hi all, During a stress test I discovered a drop of 5% performance at rate of 380K req/s when the following 3 statements were added in a frontend where HTTPS is not used http-request add-header X-Cipher-Name %sslc http-request add-header X-Cipher-Version %sslv http-request add-header

Re: [haproxy]: Performance of haproxy-to-4-nginx vs direct-to-nginx

On 30/03/2015 07:13 πμ, Krishna Kumar Unnikrishnan (Engineering) wrote: Hi all, I am testing haproxy as follows: System1: 24 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz, 64 GB. This system is running 3.19.0 kernel, and hosts the following servers: 1. nginx1 server - cpu 1-2, 1G

ldap-check with Active Directory

Hello I'm trying to use ldap-check with active directory and the response active directory gives is not one ldap-check is happy to accept when I give a 389 directory backend ldap server all is well, when I use AD I get 'Not LDAPv3 protocol' I've done a little poking about and found that

How can I secure multiple haproxy ssl certs at rest?

To not fill this up with text, I'll link directly to my post. Surely someone else has run into this problem before. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29354110/how-to-protect-haproxy-ssl-certificates-as-a-service

Re: using a fetcher in wrong context, performance tip

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, During a stress test I discovered a drop of 5% performance at rate of 380K req/s when the following 3 statements were added in a frontend where HTTPS is not used http-request add-header

Re: ldap-check with Active Directory

you should believe it :) On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Neil - HAProxy List maillist-hapr...@iamafreeman.com wrote: Hello Thanks so much. That worked well, I now get L7OK/0 in 0ms not sure I believe the 0ms but maybe I should Thanks again, Neil On 30 March 2015 at 22:14, Baptiste

Re: ldap-check with Active Directory

Hello Thanks so much. That worked well, I now get *L7OK/0 in 0ms* not sure I believe the 0ms but maybe I should Thanks again, Neil On 30 March 2015 at 22:14, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Neil - HAProxy List maillist-hapr...@iamafreeman.com wrote:

[SPAM] Hot Sale Smart Watch,simliar with MOTO360

Title: Dear Friend Dear Friend, How are you? As the Apple Watch launching,smart watch is becoming very hot product. We have several hot sale smart watches for your reference,such as D360,round circle,similar with MOTO 360. More details,pls contact with me directly.thanks.

Re: ldap-check with Active Directory

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Neil - HAProxy List maillist-hapr...@iamafreeman.com wrote: Hello I'm trying to use ldap-check with active directory and the response active directory gives is not one ldap-check is happy to accept when I give a 389 directory backend ldap server all is well,

RE: rewrite header http:// to https://

I have the following configuration: frontend http1 127.0.0.10:1080 rspirep ^Location:\ http://(.*):80(.*) Location:\ https://\1:443\2 rspirep ^Location:\ http://(.*) Location:\ https://\1 default_backend ssl1 backend ssl1 server sslserver 192.168.68.100:443 ssl verify required

RE: [SPAM] jBoss thread count issue while upgrading from 1.5dev21 to 1.5.11

Hi Willy, Put option http-tunnel in your default section, this will restore pre 1.5dev22 behavior. Read more about this here: http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#option%20http-tunnel Hmmm no, there's option forceclose, so the two are supposed to close. There's