Re: [haproxy]: Performance of haproxy-to-4-nginx vs direct-to-nginx

2015-05-05 Thread Krishna Kumar (Engineering)
Hi Baptiste, On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Baptiste wrote: > > Also, during the test, the status of various backend's change often > between > > OK to DOWN, > > and then gets back to OK almost immediately: > > > > www-backend,nginx-3,0,0,0,10,3,184,23843,96517588,,0,,27,0,0,180,DOWN > > >

Re: [haproxy]: Performance of haproxy-to-4-nginx vs direct-to-nginx

2015-05-05 Thread Krishna Kumar (Engineering)
Hi Pavlos On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote: Shall I assume that you have run the same tests without iptables and got > the same results? > Yes, I had tried it yesterday and saw no measurable difference. May I suggest to try also httpress and wrk tool? > I tried it today,

Re: [haproxy]: Performance of haproxy-to-4-nginx vs direct-to-nginx

2015-05-05 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 05/05/2015 02:06 μμ, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote: > Hi Willy, Pavlos, > > Thank you once again for your advice. > > > Requests per second:19071.55 [#/sec] (mean) > > Transfer rate: 9461.28 [Kbytes/sec] received > > These numbers are extremely low and ver

Re: [haproxy]: Performance of haproxy-to-4-nginx vs direct-to-nginx

2015-05-05 Thread Baptiste
> Also, during the test, the status of various backend's change often between > OK to DOWN, > and then gets back to OK almost immediately: > > www-backend,nginx-3,0,0,0,10,3,184,23843,96517588,,0,,27,0,0,180,DOWN > 1/2,1,1,0,7,3,6,39,,7,3,1,,220,,2,0,,37,L4CON,,0,0,184,0,0,0,0,00,0,6,Ou

[SPAM] hello!

2015-05-05 Thread Natalia
hello! how are you today? What is your name? my name is Natalia, You frequently are on this site? I today wanted to talk to you in a chat, but you have already left a chat, Ithink that in the near future we with you shall talk, how you consider? You have yahoo or hotmail ID? if you write to me, o

Re: [haproxy]: Performance of haproxy-to-4-nginx vs direct-to-nginx

2015-05-05 Thread Krishna Kumar (Engineering)
Hi Willy, Pavlos, Thank you once again for your advice. > Requests per second:19071.55 [#/sec] (mean) > > Transfer rate: 9461.28 [Kbytes/sec] received > > These numbers are extremely low and very likely indicate an http > close mode combined with an untuned nf_conntrack. > Y

LED filament bulbs

2015-05-05 Thread Joy Huang
親愛なる閣=979;または奥様。 良い一日ӗ=1;ありますように! 私は深センcoml=iteからジョイled社、中=国。深センcomlite限定導=;かれる主要な led集魚灯メー&=#12459;ー。 ここで私た =385;の熱い販売を紹介&#=12375;たいとつながった=集魚灯をあなたにӕ=5;ます 。=特徴: 1てい低にゅ=2358;りょく入力でんあ&=#12388;電圧:dc12-24v。 2.6メートルの=;ケーブルで、深いunder=wterドロップすること&#=12364;できます。 3魚を囲むよ=2358;に引きつけること&=#12364;できて、

Re: HA proxy configuration

2015-05-05 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 05/05/2015 07:11 πμ, ANISH S IYER wrote: > HI > > i need to configure HAproxy with apache server as loadbalancer > It sounds a bit strange to have a 2-tier load balancing setup using software load balancer at both tiers, unless you do SSL offloading on 1-tier. You can configure your Apache l