Hi,
We can supply you the Original Mobile Phone Battery at Very Competitive Price.
Brands include: Apple, Samsung, LG, HTC, BlackBerry, Sony, Nokia, Motorola, and etc.
Hello,
Doyoustlllookingforpowerbankthatprefectfitint=opurse,andsuitableforfullcolorprintinglogo?
Wehaveacardshapepowerbank,thisitemisyourbest=choicetocustomyourbrand,pleasefindattachedproductpicture.Thispowerbankcanbeusedforallkindsofmobilephones.
Features:1.Slimbattery,more=thinner,safterandc
Dear My friend,
Do you need stainless steel wire mesh and polyester printing mesh for solar
battery printing?
Stainless steel printing mesh:200mesh*0.04mm 30.9$/m2
Polyester printing mesh:120T-345.8$/m2
Best regards
Ada Wong
Hebei Reking Wire Mesh Co.,Ltd
Tel: + 86
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Rich Vigorito wrote:
> Reading this:
> http://blog.haproxy.com/2012/06/05/preserve-source-ip-address-despite-reverse-proxies/
> about PROXY protocol, what needs to happen for PROXY protocol to be
> recognized by the web server?
>
The webserver needs to support it
Reading this:
http://blog.haproxy.com/2012/06/05/preserve-source-ip-address-despite-reverse-proxies/?
about PROXY protocol, what needs to happen for PROXY protocol to be recognized
by the web server? Im assuming the haproxy server already does?
Thanks in advance!
_
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Rich Vigorito wrote:
> I should also clarify the goal of using this approach was to do TLS from
> router to haproxy and onto webservers but to preserve the client IP. The
> other thought I had was to SSL terminate on haproxy box and initiate new
> TLS handshake fr
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Rich Vigorito wrote:
> After changing the default gateway of the web servers to 10.10.130.79 this
> didnt fix it. The site we were testing on, and then all the other sites as
> well were unresponsive. So what I was unclear on is if we changed the default
> gatew
Gotcha, thanks.
On Aug 20, 2015 7:55 PM, "Willy Tarreau" wrote:
> Hi Praddep,
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 06:25:17PM +0530, Pradeep Jindal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems haproxy was doing wrong pointer arithmetic to update the ticket
> > ring correctly. Here's a small patch, self descriptive. Th
Hi Praddep,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 06:25:17PM +0530, Pradeep Jindal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems haproxy was doing wrong pointer arithmetic to update the ticket
> ring correctly. Here's a small patch, self descriptive. This patch is
> against the github master branch.
Patch applied, thanks. BTW, t
OK, I was testing key rotation when I didn't get expected behaviour,
thought of looking at the code and found the bug.
On Aug 20, 2015 6:37 PM, "Nenad Merdanovic" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 8/20/2015 2:55 PM, Pradeep Jindal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems haproxy was doing wrong pointer arithmetic to
Hello,
On 8/20/2015 2:55 PM, Pradeep Jindal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems haproxy was doing wrong pointer arithmetic to update the ticket
> ring correctly. Here's a small patch, self descriptive. This patch is
> against the github master branch.
Thanks for spotting this. Looking at it, I am not sure
Hi,
It seems haproxy was doing wrong pointer arithmetic to update the ticket
ring correctly. Here's a small patch, self descriptive. This patch is
against the github master branch.
Thanks
- Pradeep Jindal
tls-ticket-keys-rotation.patch
Description: Binary data
Hello,
I'm trying to make HAProxy work as a router for certain requests. What I
have is a very simple configuration which sends every tcp request to a
Lua script. The script then is responsible to parse the request, see for
which server it is and forward it there. It then waits for a response
and
13 matches
Mail list logo
