Hi,
I've not forgotten you, I'm just running out of time.
Baptiste
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:43 PM, wrote:
> Le 2015-08-28 16:40, Baptiste a écrit :
>>
>> Le 28 août 2015 15:45, a écrit :
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > We have tcp-check configured on some backends, which works fine,
>> excep
Dear Sir/Madam,
Good day!
This is RONTA(XIAMEN)CO.,LTD. We are specializing in design, development,
production and sales of different types of bags for many years, the company
passed ISO9001 quality system certification.
Following are some featured bags we’re doing:
1.Drawstring bags
2.Cotto
Hi,
No problem for me about the feature itself.
That said, a few things should be changed in the code:
- use of proxy_find_by_name() instead of parsing the proxy list
- the following statement is hardly readable: "if
(appctx->ctx.resolvers.ptr != NULL && appctx->ctx.resolvers.ptr !=
presolvers) c
Hello,
Some quick background; My current setup is haproxy in front of
Apache on the same host. If I send a request to haproxy, I see the
x-forwarded-for entry in Apache's logs and also with tcpdump
tcpdump -i any -nn -A
- -s 'host x.x.x.51 a
Title: La rentrée des rencontres
Site de rencontre généraliste où les femmes ont le pouvoir
Découvrez le site de rencontre MecACroquer ! Un site qui change les codes de la rencontre. Ce son
Hi list
I want to LB an https backend (Layer 4 LB), but I have a lot of NOSRV errors in
log :
Oct 5 15:09:38 localhost haproxy[13839]: 10.250.0.4:43318
[05/Oct/2015:15:09:38.486] fe_pp-portail-https be_pp-xctl-https/ -1/-1/0
0 -- 0/0/0/0/3 0/0
Oct 5 15:09:43 localhost haproxy[13839]: 10.250
Hi,
(comments inline)
On 10/05/2015 03:23 PM, Kevin COUSIN wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I want to LB an https backend (Layer 4 LB), but I have a lot of NOSRV errors
> in log :
>
> Oct 5 15:09:38 localhost haproxy[13839]: 10.250.0.4:43318
> [05/Oct/2015:15:09:38.486] fe_pp-portail-https be_pp-xctl-h
Hi,
I process this email later. For waiting, I propose to you to set the
"option http-server-close". Actually, the "services" doesn't support
itself the keepalive, but HAProxy does this job.
The "option http-server-close" expectes a server-close from the service
stream. The front of HAProxy maint
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Travis Fitch wrote:
> My issue is, if I bypass the hardware LB, I see the X-Forwarded-For
> header, if I go via the the Hardware LB to haproxy and onto Apache, I don't
> see any x-forwarded-for headers in Apaches log files.
I am new to haproxy but it sounds like
Hi.
Am 05-10-2015 14:29, schrieb Travis Fitch:
Hello,
Some quick background; My current setup is haproxy in front of Apache
on
the same host. If I send a request to haproxy, I see the
x-forwarded-for
entry in Apache's logs and also with tcpdump
tcpdump -i any -nn -A - -s 'host x.x.
Hi,
2015-10-04 23:33 GMT+02:00 Daren Sefcik :
> I am trying to make some requests go to specific backends but am finding
> that in certain backends that the url gets doubled up or otherwise mangled,
> ie:
>
> request to frontend = http://my.company.com
> what the backend server ends up with =
> ht
Hi,
- Mail original -
> De: "Conrad Hoffmann"
> À: "Kevin COUSIN" , haproxy@formilux.org
> Envoyé: Lundi 5 Octobre 2015 15:49:36
> Objet: Re: NOSRV error
> Hi,
>
> (comments inline)
>
> On 10/05/2015 03:23 PM, Kevin COUSIN wrote:
>> Hi list
>>
>
> This usually means that there is no
Hi list,
It looks like IPv6 parsing may lead to errors.
The logic cannot distinguish from ‘2001:db8::1234:80’ as :
- a plain IPv6 address 2001:db8::1234:80
- IPv6 2001:db8::1234 on port 80
It always default to the latter, considering any valid word made only of
digits as a port.
(see https://g
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Kevin COUSIN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> - Mail original -
>> De: "Conrad Hoffmann"
>> À: "Kevin COUSIN" , haproxy@formilux.org
>> Envoyé: Lundi 5 Octobre 2015 15:49:36
>> Objet: Re: NOSRV error
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> (comments inline)
>>
>> On 10/05/2015 03:23 PM, Kevin COUS
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Baptiste wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No problem for me about the feature itself.
> That said, a few things should be changed in the code:
>
> - use of proxy_find_by_name() instead of parsing the proxy list
I'm fairly certain that 'proxy_find_by_name' does not search the
dns_r
> It looks like IPv6 parsing may lead to errors.
> The logic cannot distinguish from ‘2001:db8::1234:80’ as :
> - a plain IPv6 address 2001:db8::1234:80
> - IPv6 2001:db8::1234 on port 80
As far I remember, to prevent this confusion, we made the final
colon mandatory on IPv6 addresses. This way, a
Le 2015-10-05 18:07, David du Colombier a écrit :
It looks like IPv6 parsing may lead to errors.
The logic cannot distinguish from ‘2001:db8::1234:80’ as :
- a plain IPv6 address 2001:db8::1234:80
- IPv6 2001:db8::1234 on port 80
As far I remember, to prevent this confusion, we made the final
c
Sorry I'd not noticed that. Everything looks good now thank you Willy.
Ben
On 4 October 2015 at 09:41, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Resending after some mails were lost du to low space on device...
>
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 11:15:35PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 03:56:5
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 06:33:36PM +0100, Ben Cabot wrote:
> Sorry I'd not noticed that. Everything looks good now thank you Willy.
OK thanks Ben.
Willy
Hey Joris, I appreciate the help...I am not sure I quite understand though,
is there something I can configure in haproxy to resolve this? It is not
just a Wordpress problem, I have other sites also that do not behave
correctly when I put haproxy in front of them.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:22 AM, j
Hi Thierry,
With or without "option http-server-close" does not seem to make any
difference.
Adding a empty backend does seem to resolve the problem, stats also show
the backend handling connections and tracking its 2xx http result
session totals when configured like this.:
frontend http_f
Hi ,
I have installed Haproxy servere 5.1 on linux RHEL 6.1
I have configured Haproxy servere on linux at 80 port and trying to do reverse
proxy with backend on https protocol (443). Is it possible in haparoxy ?
Client -->http traffic -->Haproxy server-->https traffic-->backend server
If I hav
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Kuchekar, Yogita (Yogita) <
ykuche...@avaya.com> wrote:
> Hi ,
>
>
>
> I have installed Haproxy servere 5.1 on linux RHEL 6.1
>
Assuming you mean haproxy version 1.5, then yes both scenarios are
possible. I'm sure you can find many blog posts and sample configura
Thanks for your reply..
Sorry for the typo. Version for Haproxy is 1.5.
I have been trying to achieve this for a while referring to forum examples.
My configuration is like this. Could you please point me to a working example .
defaults
modehttp
log
Hi Everyone,
Please I need help. I have this setup and I want to be able to route SMTP
traffic from the client access servers to the internet via HAProxy:
HAProxy:
Management IP: 10.0.0.133
Virtual IP: 10.0.0.101 [A Public IP address is NAT'ed to this VIP]
Microsoft Exchange 2013:
CA
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Kuchekar, Yogita (Yogita) <
ykuche...@avaya.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply..
>
>
>
> Sorry for the typo. Version for Haproxy is 1.5.
>
>
>
> I have been trying to achieve this for a while referring to forum examples.
>
> My configuration is like this. Could you
Hi Julien,
>> Maybe you can also try with "curl --tlsv1.2" which should use a 3.3
>> version.
>
> That's a very interesting details. Indeed curl sets the HELLO version to
> 0x0303
> whereas OpenSSL uses 0x0301. Interestingly, both Firefox and Chrome also
> use 0x0301
> in the version of the reco
Andrew,
My appologies about the proxy_find_by_name function, I was not in the
right context!!!
Tested and approved.
Willy, you can apply :)
Thanks a lot for your contribution, Andrew.
Baptiste
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Andrew Hayworth
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Baptiste
Sorry don't know why the previous message was sent only to you and not to
the forum as well. Maybe because I sent it from my phone. Anyway,
rectifying that now.
>From what you posted about haproxy config, I can't see how can that acl
cause any problems and why would haproxy rewrite the url in the
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:57:08PM +0200, Baptiste wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> My appologies about the proxy_find_by_name function, I was not in the
> right context!!!
> Tested and approved.
>
> Willy, you can apply :)
>
> Thanks a lot for your contribution, Andrew.
Applied, thanks guys!
Willy
30 matches
Mail list logo