Le 3 avr. 2016 03:45, "CJ Ess" a écrit :
>
> Oops, that is important - I have both the maxconn and fullconn settings
in the defaults section.
>
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 4:37 PM, PiBa-NL wrote:
>>
>> Op 2-4-2016 om 22:32 schreef CJ Ess:
>>>
>>> So in my config file I have:
>>>
>>> maxconn 65535
>>
From: Vincent Bernat
In C89, "void *" is automatically promoted to any pointer type. Casting
the result of malloc/calloc to the type of the LHS variable is therefore
unneeded.
Most of this patch was built using this Coccinelle patch:
@@
type T;
@@
- (T *)
(\(lua_touserdata\|malloc\|calloc\|
From: Vincent Bernat
Instead of repeating the type of the LHS argument (sizeof(struct ...))
in calls to malloc/calloc, we directly use the pointer
name (sizeof(*...)). The following Coccinelle patch was used:
@@
type T;
T *x;
@@
x = malloc(
- sizeof(T)
+ sizeof(*x)
)
@@
type T;
T *x;
@@
❦ 29 mars 2016 16:52 +0200, Willy Tarreau :
>> l = calloc(1, sizeof(struct listener));
>
> I definitely agree. This code is quite old (2005) and we don't do that
> much cleanup passes unfortunately. Oh and yes by the way, in case people
> have doubts about this, I wrote it and used to proceed li
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 04:43:50PM -0300, Thiago Farina wrote:
> While at it use "You" instead of "They" as in the context
> it seems to make more sense to refer to "you", as it is
> you that are going to be running the command, there is no
> "they".
Applied, thanks Thiago.
Willy
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 01:52:16PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> >l = calloc(1, sizeof(*l));
>
> So, I did that too.
Great!
> >> 1. can we remove uneeded void* cast?
> >
> > As much as possible yes!
>
> OK, done. I did not consider casts of simple types (char*, ...) if they
> were not cau
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 08:53:05PM +0200, Conrad Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a small bug in dumpstats.c, stats_dump_fields_csv(). One of the
> writes is to the global `trash` chunk, which happens to be the right one,
> but it should be to what gets passed in as argument (out).
Good catch,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:05:36PM +0100, Kobus Bensch wrote:
> Remove Me please
Done. Normally you just have to send your e-mail to haproxy+unsubscribe.
Willy
Except with systemd based distros where its a unit file setting.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: CJ Ess
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 6:48:56 PM
To: PiBa-NL
Cc: HAProxy
Subject: Re: KA-BOOM! Hit MaxConn despite higher setting in config file
I'm on Linux so I think that /etc
On 01/04/2016 12:25 μμ, Baptiste wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Hi Willy & other core devs/pms.
>>
>> I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet.
>>
>> Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and plans for
>> HTTP/2.
>>
>> Than
On 01/04/2016 04:20 μμ, Andrew Hayworth wrote:
> Hi there -
>
> Have you considered HAProxy in multiprocess mode? You could have a
> frontend spread across multiple threads that terminates SSL. We're
> experimenting with such a design here.
>
It has been mentioned before that you can increase ca
Dear Sir/Madam,
My name is Alhaji Abubakar Magaji, PERMANENT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF WORKS, is
your company capable to handle contracts and supply of your products/services
as a contractor towards the project of rebuilding Nigeria.
Construction contract include: Bridge, Roads, Railways, Airports, B
Hi Frederik,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:37:03PM -0700, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> >> It seems that we would be a bit more efficient if we also aborted when
> >> si_b->state was SI_ST_INI: that is, don't even try to open a connection
> >> to the backend if we're shutting down the frontend.
> >
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo