haproxy@formilux.org Account Termination Notice **UPGRADE NOW**

2016-06-19 Thread Customer Care
haproxy@formilux.org, `A8v84�AE{B1�4D�9D]F2nE1 �D9SEF�FDO1A[FC�F4`A8v84�AE{B1e45�9Cb16`A8SEF�FDeE0lD5Q8DcA5e36fF4Y1Av84u35[50�AENF6 �81~E7~EDO7Fu28`A8v84�AE{B1�0C`A8�00�81zCBS73S47~A7`A8v84�AE{B1�4D�9D002 �D9�79g0DRA1f2FQ4D�39v84002 S47~A7�AE{B1�4D�9D�D9�CC N00eE6S47~A7[8Cb10�0C`A8v8

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: systemd: Perform sanity check on config before reload

2016-06-19 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 20/06/2016 12:50 πμ, Jason Harvey wrote: > Is it valid to have multiple ExecReload statements? > > The way I've achieved this in my setup is as follows: > > |ExecReload=/bin/bash -c '*@SBINDIR@/haproxy*-c -f $CONFIG&&/bin/kill -USR2 > $MAINPID'| > > Yes, it is valid configuration which has

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: systemd: Perform sanity check on config before reload

2016-06-19 Thread Jason Harvey
Is it valid to have multiple ExecReload statements? The way I've achieved this in my setup is as follows: ExecReload=/bin/bash -c '*@SBINDIR@/haproxy* -c -f $CONFIG && /bin/kill -USR2 $MAINPID' On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > On 15/06/2016 03:18 μμ, Pavlos Parissis w

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: systemd: Perform sanity check on config before reload

2016-06-19 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 15/06/2016 03:18 μμ, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > Hi, > > Please consider merging the attached patch which instructs systemd to run a > sanity check > on the configuration before the reload. If you accept the patch then you have > to apply it on > top the '[PATCH] MINOR: systemd: Use variable for

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: systemd: Use variable for config and pidfile paths

2016-06-19 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 14/06/2016 01:39 μμ, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > Hi, > > Please consider merging the attached patch which allows users to set the > location of > haproxy.cfg and pidfile files by providing a systemd overwrite file > /etc/systemd/system/haproxy.service.d/overwrite.conf with the following > conten

unsubscribe

2016-06-19 Thread Iqbal Aroussi

Re: SNI healthcheck on backend?

2016-06-19 Thread Ray Cote
Hi Willy: On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > I think at this point we'd rather add an "sni" argument to the tcp-check > connect, then you could resort to this one instead. That would allow you > to write whatever complex sequence as you'd like. > Agree that this sounds like

Re: haproxy's resolver send queries with "response" flag

2016-06-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 04:27:16PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi, > > > Am 17.06.2016 um 20:56 schrieb Cyril Bonté: > > > > This has been fixed after 1.6.5 with commit 5f60de0866 "BUG/MEDIUM: dns: > > unbreak DNS resolver after header fix". > > http://www.haproxy.org/git?p=haproxy-1.6.git

Re: haproxy's resolver send queries with "response" flag

2016-06-19 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, Am 17.06.2016 um 20:56 schrieb Cyril Bonté: This has been fixed after 1.6.5 with commit 5f60de0866 "BUG/MEDIUM: dns: unbreak DNS resolver after header fix". http://www.haproxy.org/git?p=haproxy-1.6.git;a=commit;h=5f60de08667c3472d95cc20b87753e9fd8520057 Willy, maybe we should release

Re: haproxy's resolver send queries with "response" flag

2016-06-19 Thread DURAND Grégory
Hi Cyril, Thanks for the reply. > This has been fixed after 1.6.5 with commit 5f60de0866 "BUG/MEDIUM: > dns:  > unbreak DNS resolver after header fix". > http://www.haproxy.org/git?p=haproxy-1.6.git;a=commit;h=5f60de08667c3 > 472d95cc20b87753e9fd8520057 I applied the patch. It fixes the issue.