Further... the odd/broken behavior might be being caused related to no
sni indication on the health checks...
This config sort of works:
*server app2 ssltest.example.ca:443 ssl verify required /verifyhost
ssltest.example.ca/ sni ssl_fc_sni ca-file
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt check che
Ok finally got around to testing this out today; running into a bit of
an issue with the new syntax.
What I'm trying to achieve is:
frontend www-https
bind :::443 v4v6 ssl crt /etc/haproxy/certs/www.example.org.pem crt
/etc/haproxy/certs/
backend www-backend-https
server ssl 10.0.0
I have used ELB (public) as a front of Haproxy and ELB (internal) as a
backend for the apps server.
so structure is like as follows. Currently using Haproxy 1.7. However,
request is not going to the backend server.
ELB -> HAPROXY -> ELB -> APPS server.
Following config in my haproxy. Let me k
On 07/03/2017 01:46 PM, Andjelko Iharos wrote:
> On 07/02/2017 09:52 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 01:37:52AM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>> This could either be introduced only in the current development version
>>> because of the compatibility breakage or a paramet
After discussion with Willy I finally drop this change. Kind regards.
On 21 July 2017 at 08:23, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:17:14AM +0100, David CARLIER wrote:
> > Hi Willy, fair points.
>
> I don't understand, this the patch still uses MALLOC/FREE.
>
> Willy
>
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:17:14AM +0100, David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi Willy, fair points.
I don't understand, this the patch still uses MALLOC/FREE.
Willy
Hi Willy, fair points.
Kind regards.
On 21 July 2017 at 08:10, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:03:27AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > I thought something like
> >
> > `my_pcrealloc` use `create_pool` inside and `my_pcrefree` use
> > `pool_destroy2` but one of
Hi Aleks,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 09:03:27AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> I thought something like
>
> `my_pcrealloc` use `create_pool` inside and `my_pcrefree` use
> `pool_destroy2` but one of the main question is how does the pcre2
> handle the custom memory struct we have in the pools.
>
Hi Willy Tarreau,
Willy Tarreau wrote on 21.07.2017:
> Hi David,
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 07:36:37AM +0100, David CARLIER wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> hopefully it will be revealed useful, in this patch, we re trying to use
>> the MALLOC/FREE macros since pcre* libraries are capable of overriding
>
9 matches
Mail list logo