Hello,
I am trying to setup haproxy with two way authentication. While the frontend
looks good one of the backends is giving me headaches with ssl handshake
failures.
Here is how the frontends and backends does look like:
frontend http-in
bind 69.64.57.197:80
redirect scheme https
Hi,
Hope this note finds you well.
As I understand that you are one of the Exhibitors of an upcoming event
"Custom Electronic Design & Installation Association (CEDIA) - 2017" held on
Sep 05-09 in San Diego, CA, USA, I thought I'd check if you are interested
in acquiring the"
Hi All,
On web site www.haproxy.org I see this
- *version 1.7* : added, content processing agents, multi-type certs, ...
B
ut cannot find any info about something NEW regarding Hot Server
Reconfiguration process.
In documentation, only old process of reload (
/etc/init.d/haproxy reload
)
Hey all,
We fixed a few bugs in the DNS SRV records and added support for DNS
extension (to announce we can accept a "big" response payload).
It is now safer to run HAProxy 1.8-dev with services discovery tools
(kubernetes, consul, etc...) and get updates using SRV records. Don't
forget to mix
> If you want to use nproc 40 and use the CLI, you'll have to define 40 CLI
>> sockets, bound to each process and send the command to each one.
>>
>
>
Hi Cyril, Stefan,
You can also use Pavlos' haproxytool to ease your life and run the command
once: https://github.com/unixsurfer/haproxytool
You
Hi,
Le 22/08/2017 à 15:39, Stefan Sticht a écrit :
Hi,
if I place backend servers into maintainance mode (using hatop CLI )
they will still get connections. I believe this only happens with nbproc>1.
Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? HAProxy Version:
1.7.9-1ppa1~xenial
You gave
Hi,
if I place backend servers into maintainance mode (using hatop CLI )
they will still get connections. I believe this only happens with nbproc>1.
Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? HAProxy Version:
1.7.9-1ppa1~xenial
Aug 22 15:31:30 w-fw1 haproxy[30821]: Server
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15:27AM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> I have just had a look at this issue. In fact the required modifications
> were not that complicated.
>
> Here is a simple patch for this issue.
Ah cool, thanks Fred! Now applied.
Willy
On 07/28/2017 05:23 PM, David CARLIER wrote:
Good points :-) sorry for the noise.
On 28 July 2017 at 14:07, Willy Tarreau >
wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0100, David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Nothing serious, just
9 matches
Mail list logo