thanks wily.
re: " CONTRIBUTING in the sources directory," -
yes, that is what I was looking for! thanks for the tip.
re: least it seems important to round up non-null values to the next
millisecond.
Definitely, we can and should add some checks for invalid values, etc.
I'll read
Hi Nick,
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:27:29PM -0800, Nick Galbreath wrote:
> Hello Adis,
>
> We could certainly add another API/Lua function but it might be easier to
> change
>
> luaL_checkinteger(L, 2) in
>
> tmout = MAY_LJMP(luaL_checkinteger(L, 2)) * 1000;
>
> to luaL_checknumber(L, 2),
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:25:11AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I just checked the contents and its OK. I think we have something wrong
> on the script which generates the snapshots. The git version and the date
> are normally updated on the fly by git when building the archive, thanks
> to
Hello Adis,
We could certainly add another API/Lua function but it might be easier to
change
luaL_checkinteger(L, 2) in
tmout = MAY_LJMP(luaL_checkinteger(L, 2)) * 1000;
to luaL_checknumber(L, 2), along with appropriate cast to int.
Then we have backwards compatibility, less documentation
Hi Willy, List,
Is it correct that when i build a haproxy-ss-20171017 snapshot that the
version still shows up as:
"HAProxy version 1.7.9, released 2017/08/18"
on both haproxy -vv and stats page.?
Or did i do it wrong?
p.s. I changed the Makefile like this:
PORTNAME= haproxy-ss
Hi,
Hope this email finds you doing great.
I see that your company is one of the promising exibitors at AWS re:Invent
2017, Nov 27th - Dec 1st, Las Vegas. I was wondering if you would be
interested in acquiring the attendees list ( Double verified, Opt-In
Contacts ) for your pre and post event
Hi Willy,
Op 9-11-2017 om 5:45 schreef Willy Tarreau:
Hi Pieter,
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 02:28:46AM +0100, PiBa-NL wrote:
Actually haproxy has been running for a few weeks with 100% and i didnt
notice.. it does keep working it seems..
Anyhow thought i would try and capture the next event if
I am utilizing HA_Proxy for TCP load balancing and my configuration is
(Keepalive Virtual IP -> Ha_Proxy -> syslog-ng -> source_ip.log).
When receiving TCP payloads which are multi line the first line is
forwarded appropriately to the source IP log file and rest of the payload
goes to a secondary
On 11/05/2017 09:27 AM, my.card@web.de wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
I've implemented a very basic wireshark (https://www.wireshark.org)
dissector for SPOP. I've stumbled over the following issue, that I
couldn't figure out, yet.
ACTION-ARGS should be multiple TYPED-DATA items, but the data sent
Andrew,
Am 09.11.2017 um 02:00 schrieb Andrew Smalley:
> The above is a guess, can you supply the build commands and clarify
> this line in the config " bind :::80 v4v6" ? Dont you want to "bind
> *:80" and use IPv4 only
While Willy already replied that the bug is fixed (and no matter how
wrong
Willy,
Am 09.11.2017 um 05:33 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> It is harmless (despite annoying for your tests) since it dies when freeing
> everything on exit. If you want to get rid of it, it's fixed in the latest
> daily snapshot.
>
I ran across it while creating an early pull request to add support
Hi,
If you are talking about TCP health checks, this is a normal behaviour
because we take care of closing the connection with a RST after the
handshake.
And when closing the connection with RST there is no TIME_WAIT because
RFC 793 explicitly says that on |RST| reception no response is to be
Hi:
I am confused about why there is no TIME-WAIT socket when using Haproxy to
check Redis living status. Could any one give me some hit, or even get me
to the specific source code?
Thanks a lot.
13 matches
Mail list logo
