Re[2]: haproxy-1.8 in Fedora

2018-01-05 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi. -- Originalnachricht -- Von: "Ryan O'Hara" An: "Aleksandar Lazic" Cc: haproxy@formilux.org Gesendet: 05.01.2018 23:35:10 Betreff: Re: haproxy-1.8 in Fedora On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: Hi Ryan. -- Originalnachricht -- Von: "Ryan O'Hara" An

Re: haproxy-1.8 in Fedora

2018-01-05 Thread Ryan O'Hara
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi Ryan. > > -- Originalnachricht -- > Von: "Ryan O'Hara" > An: haproxy@formilux.org > Gesendet: 05.01.2018 17:19:15 > Betreff: haproxy-1.8 in Fedora > > Just wanted to inform Fedora users that haproxy-1.8.3 is now in the master >

Re: haproxy-1.8 in Fedora

2018-01-05 Thread Andrew Smalley
Hi Ryan Copr is an easy-to-use automatic build system providing a package repository as its output. Start with making your own repository in these three steps: choose a system and architecture you want to build for provide Copr with src.rpm packages available online let Copr do all the work and

Re: How can i use proxy server for my backend servers.

2018-01-05 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi. -- Originalnachricht -- Von: "Kuldip Madnani" An: haproxy@formilux.org Gesendet: 05.01.2018 17:32:25 Betreff: How can i use proxy server for my backend servers. Hi, I would like to use a http proxy, to access my backends that are defined in my haproxy configuration. Is there a wa

Re: haproxy-1.8 in Fedora

2018-01-05 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi Ryan. -- Originalnachricht -- Von: "Ryan O'Hara" An: haproxy@formilux.org Gesendet: 05.01.2018 17:19:15 Betreff: haproxy-1.8 in Fedora Just wanted to inform Fedora users that haproxy-1.8.3 is now in the master branch and built for Rawhide. I will not be updating haproxy to 1.8 in c

Re[2]: haproxy without balancing

2018-01-05 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Hi Angelo. -- Originalnachricht -- Von: "Angelo Hongens" An: haproxy@formilux.org Gesendet: 05.01.2018 11:49:55 Betreff: Re: haproxy without balancing On 05-01-2018 11:28, Johan Hendriks wrote: Secondly we could use a single ip and use ACL to route the traffic to the right backend ser

How can i use proxy server for my backend servers.

2018-01-05 Thread Kuldip Madnani
Hi, I would like to use a http proxy, to access my backends that are defined in my haproxy configuration. Is there a way we can define http_proxy in HAProxy configuration? Thanks, Kuldip

haproxy-1.8 in Fedora

2018-01-05 Thread Ryan O'Hara
Just wanted to inform Fedora users that haproxy-1.8.3 is now in the master branch and built for Rawhide. I will not be updating haproxy to 1.8 in current stable releases of Fedora since I received some complaints about doing major updates (eg. 1.6 to 1.7) is previous stables releases. That said, th

Re: mworker: seamless reloads broken since 1.8.1

2018-01-05 Thread Pierre Cheynier
On 05/01/2018 16:44, William Lallemand wrote: > I'm able to reproduce, looks like it happens with the nbthread parameter only, Exact, I observe the same. At least I have a workaround for now to perform the upgrade. > I'll try to find the problem in the code. > Thanks ! Pierre

Re: mworker: seamless reloads broken since 1.8.1

2018-01-05 Thread William Lallemand
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 03:52:22PM +0100, Pierre Cheynier wrote: > OK so now that I've applied all of Lukas recos (I kept the -x added ) : > > * I don't see any ALERT log anymore.. Only the WARNs > I'm still seing a few of them in journalctl. Maybe you don't see those emitted by the workers, the

Re: haproxy without balancing

2018-01-05 Thread Johan Hendriks
Op 05/01/2018 om 11:46 schreef Jonathan Matthews: > On 5 January 2018 at 10:28, Johan Hendriks wrote: >> BTW if this is the wrong list please excuse me. > This looks to me like it might be the right list :-) > >> We have an application running over multiple servers which all have >> there own su

Re: mworker: seamless reloads broken since 1.8.1

2018-01-05 Thread Pierre Cheynier
>> Hi, >> >>> Your systemd configuration is not uptodate. >>> >>> Please: >>> - make sure haproxy is compiled with USE_SYSTEMD=1 >>> - update the unit file: start haproxy with -Ws instead of -W (ExecStart) >>> - update the unit file: use Type=notify instead of Type=forking >> In fact that should w

Re: mworker: seamless reloads broken since 1.8.1

2018-01-05 Thread Pierre Cheynier
> Hi, > >>> $ cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/haproxy.service >>> [Unit] >>> Description=HAProxy Load Balancer >>> After=syslog.target network.target >>> >>> [Service] >>> EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/haproxy >>> ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/haproxy -f $CONFIG -c -q >>> ExecStart=/usr/sbin/haproxy -W -f $

Re: mworker: seamless reloads broken since 1.8.1

2018-01-05 Thread William Lallemand
Hi, > > $ cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/haproxy.service > > [Unit] > > Description=HAProxy Load Balancer > > After=syslog.target network.target > > > > [Service] > > EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/haproxy > > ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/haproxy -f $CONFIG -c -q > > ExecStart=/usr/sbin/haproxy -W -f $CONF

Re: mworker: seamless reloads broken since 1.8.1

2018-01-05 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello Pierre, On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Pierre Cheynier wrote: > Hi list, > > We've recently tried to upgrade from 1.8.0 to 1.8.1, then 1.8.2, 1.8.3 > on a preprod environment and noticed that the reload is not so seamless > since 1.8.1 (easily getting TCP RSTs while reloading). > > Havin

Re: haproxy without balancing

2018-01-05 Thread Angelo Hongens
On 05-01-2018 11:28, Johan Hendriks wrote: Secondly we could use a single ip and use ACL to route the traffic to the right backend server. The problem with the second option is that we have around 2000 different subdomains and this number is still growing. So my haproxy config will then consists

mworker: seamless reloads broken since 1.8.1

2018-01-05 Thread Pierre Cheynier
Hi list, We've recently tried to upgrade from 1.8.0 to 1.8.1, then 1.8.2, 1.8.3 on a preprod environment and noticed that the reload is not so seamless since 1.8.1 (easily getting TCP RSTs while reloading). Having a short look on the haproxy-1.8 git remote on the changes affecting haproxy.c, c2b2

Re: HAProxy 1.8.3 SSL caching regression

2018-01-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:14:41PM -0500, Jeffrey J. Persch wrote: > Hi William, > > Verified. > > Thanks for the quick fix, Great, patch now merged. Thanks! Willy

Re: haproxy without balancing

2018-01-05 Thread Jonathan Matthews
On 5 January 2018 at 10:28, Johan Hendriks wrote: > BTW if this is the wrong list please excuse me. This looks to me like it might be the right list :-) > We have an application running over multiple servers which all have > there own subdomain, there are about 12 of them. > We can live without

haproxy without balancing

2018-01-05 Thread Johan Hendriks
Hello. First off all I wish everyone a really good 2018. And hopefully 2018 will serve a lot of good memory's. BTW if this is the wrong list please excuse me. We have an application running over multiple servers which all have there own subdomain, there are about 12 of them. We can live without l

Re: [PATCH] Remove rbtree.[ch]

2018-01-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > The rbtree implementation as found in haproxy, is currently unused, and has > been for quite some time. > I don't think we will need it again, so the attached patch just removes it. I'm pretty sure we planned to remove it a very l

Re: Haproxy 1.8 version help

2018-01-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi guys, On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:20:32PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Angelo Hongens wrote: > > On 03-01-2018 17:39, Lukas Tribus wrote: > >> > >> To compile Haproxy 1.8 with threads, at least GCC 4.7 is needed. > >> CentOs 6 only ships GCC 4.4.7, therefor comp