Hi
I have an app deployed in Pivotal Cloudfoundry (PCF) and to route traffic
to an app in PCF, we have to use application route name (virtual hostname).
We have PCF in two different datacenters and I need to load balance the
traffic to these DCs , but I'm having the challenge in checking the
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 06:39:07AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I think that a few operators like strcmp() and concat() should be
> implemented to cover the short-term needs.
I forgot that I finally implemented concat() after talking about it for
about a year :-) It is a good starting point to
Hi Tim,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:16:15AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> The solution I got from "Holger Just" was:
>
> > http-request set-header X-CHECKSNI %[req.hdr(host)]==%[ssl_fc_sni] if
> > { ssl_fc_has_sni }
> > http-request deny if { ssl_fc_has_sni } ! {
>
Hi Lukas,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 01:56:42AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello Willy,
>
>
> On 25 April 2018 at 12:16, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >> I'm not even sure that differentiate "Host" header from SNI values is
> >> possible on softwares like Nginx or Apache.
> >
> > It
Hello Willy,
On 25 April 2018 at 12:16, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>> I'm not even sure that differentiate "Host" header from SNI values is
>> possible on softwares like Nginx or Apache.
>
> It should not, that would be a violation of HTTP over TLS.
I think I disagree.
This is very
Hi Thierry,
Op 26-4-2018 om 12:25 schreef thierry.fourn...@arpalert.org:
Your trace shows a corrupted tree. Maybe it is due to the freebsd
architecture and the corruption is no reproductible on Linux ? I do not have
freebsd for testing.
Regards,
Thierry
My 'best' reproduction scenario
I need to perform HTTP healthcheck on individual backend servers and load
balance among active backend servers.This works fine with single backend server
when we mention host name in httpchk (option httpchk GET /info HTTP/1.1 Host:\
abc.mysrv1.com)
However i am unable to successfully
Willy,
Am 25.04.2018 um 12:16 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:48:13AM +, GALLISSOT VINCENT wrote:
>> I don't see a case were one would define a different check-sni or sni values
>> from the "Host" header.
>
> It definitely must match in HTTP. *snip*
>
>> I'm not even
Hello Haproxy mailing list
I have been looking at caching technology and have found this
https://github.com/jiangwenyuan/nuster/
It claims to be a v1.7 / v1.8 branch fully compatible with haproxy
and indeed based on haproxy with the added capibility of having a
really fast cache as described
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 02:42:46PM +0200, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Here is a patch to fix a bug recently reported by Pieter in the lua part (in
> the thread ".1.9dev LUA core.tcp() cannot be used from different threads").
Applied, thanks!
Willy
Hi
I have got a frontend in mode http that sets various headers
unconditionally:
> http-response set-headerExpect-CT
> "max-age=3600; report-uri=\"https://xxx.report-uri.com/r/d/ct/reportOnly\";
> http-response set-headerExpect-Staple
>
Hi,
According to
https://www.haproxy.com/blog/truly-seamless-reloads-with-haproxy-no-more-hacks/
:
"The patchset has already been merged into the HAProxy 1.8 development
branch and will soon be backported to HAProxy Enterprise Edition 1.7r1
and possibly 1.6r2."
Has it been backported to
Willy,
Here is a patch to fix a bug recently reported by Pieter in the lua part
(in the thread ".1.9dev LUA core.tcp() cannot be used from different
threads").
Thanks,
--
Christopher Faulet
>From b38e9bdf727073a6063f1c56f173a247969c6f9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christopher Faulet
Le 26/04/2018 à 12:01, Thierry Fournier a écrit :
On 26 Apr 2018, at 11:49, Christopher Faulet wrote:
Le 25/04/2018 à 20:51, PiBa-NL a écrit :
Hi Christopher, Thierry,
Op 25-4-2018 om 11:30 schreef Christopher Faulet:
Oh, these tasks can be created before the threads
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 01:48:27PM +0200, Aurélien Nephtali wrote:
> Willy,
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Thanks for this. All of this looks OK to me. Please just let me know if
> > you want me to merge them now or if you expect other adjustments.
>
Hello,
I set a global http-reuse safe.
HAProxy displays a warning for http-reuse and send-proxy combinaison on
TCP mode backends, but http-reuse is active only on HTTP mode backends.
[WARNING] 115/135122 (26529) : config : proxy ' SMTPS_SUBMISSION' :
connections to server 'f1' will have a
Willy,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Thanks for this. All of this looks OK to me. Please just let me know if
> you want me to merge them now or if you expect other adjustments.
I think it's OK for me.
Thanks !
--
Aurélien Nephtali
Hi Aurélien,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:52:59AM +0200, Aurélien Nephtali wrote:
> Hello Willy,
>
> Sorry for the delay.
no problem.
> Here are the three amended patches.
>
> Changes:
> - update the documentation
> - add some comments regarding the detection of the payload pattern
>
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 22:13:46 +0200
PiBa-NL wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> Op 25-4-2018 om 11:19 schreef Thierry Fournier:
> > I extracted the part which dumps the ‘core.get_info()’, and I can’t
> > reproduce
> > the segfault. I attach the extracted code. I use le lastest
Hi,
Thanks, it's working now. I saw peers mentioned elsewhere, but disregarded
that section since i was testing on a single instance.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
>
> On 26 April 2018 at 09:45, Christian Greger
> On 26 Apr 2018, at 11:49, Christopher Faulet wrote:
>
> Le 25/04/2018 à 20:51, PiBa-NL a écrit :
>> Hi Christopher, Thierry,
>> Op 25-4-2018 om 11:30 schreef Christopher Faulet:
>>> Oh, these tasks can be created before the threads creation... Ok, so
>>> maybe the right
Le 25/04/2018 à 20:51, PiBa-NL a écrit :
Hi Christopher, Thierry,
Op 25-4-2018 om 11:30 schreef Christopher Faulet:
Oh, these tasks can be created before the threads creation... Ok, so
maybe the right way to fix the bug is to registered these tasks
without specific affinity and set it on the
Hello Christian,
On 26 April 2018 at 09:45, Christian Greger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was hoping the seamless reload in 1.8 would retain stick tables, but I'm
> having no luck. Is it possible?
>
Stick tables can be transferred from the old to the new process while
reloading by
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:58:07AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > I am mean in case of dedicated listen socket pooler also can be
> > > dedicated, for load planing. For example:
> > >
> > > frontend tcp1
> > > bind x.x.x.206:443
> > > bind-process 1/9-1/16
> > >
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:49:53AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:35:51AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:25:59AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:21:27AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > > >
Hello Willy,
Sorry for the delay.
Here are the three amended patches.
Changes:
- update the documentation
- add some comments regarding the detection of the payload pattern
and the input that is zero terminated
- use appctx->chunk to gather data without using the trash
-
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:35:51AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:25:59AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:21:27AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > > Pollers distinct from frontend?
> > > > > Can I bind pollers to CPU?
> > > >
>
Hi,
I was hoping the seamless reload in 1.8 would retain stick tables, but I'm
having no luck. Is it possible?
I'm testing this with:
haproxy: 1.8.8, single master, single thread, nbproc 1
OS: CentOS 7.4.1708
socket: stats socket /var/run/haproxy.sock level admin expose-fd listeners
Systemctl
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:25:59AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:21:27AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > Pollers distinct from frontend?
> > > > Can I bind pollers to CPU?
> > >
> > > Each thread has its own poller. Since you map threads to CPUs you indeed
> >
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:21:27AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > Pollers distinct from frontend?
> > > Can I bind pollers to CPU?
> >
> > Each thread has its own poller. Since you map threads to CPUs you indeed
> > have one poller per CPU.
>
> Each pooler pool all sockets or only
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 03:49:09PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 04:24:42PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > TCP load rise CPU use on all core (0-15), I am expect rise CPU use
> > > > only on 8-15 core. What I am miss?
> > >
> > > It's unrelated to the frontend's
31 matches
Mail list logo