Hi,
This patch fixes a typo in the README of the peers section of this subsystem
and 2 typos in code comments. Groupped together as cleanup to avoid too
many 1 char patches.
Technically the fix in contrib/wireshark-dissectors/peers/README could
be classified as DOC change, let me know if I need t
Hi,
Please find attached a patch which fixes 3 common typos in the
comments of the contrib/spoa_example subsystem.
The patch is attached, but if you want to view the diff online, you
can check:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/compare/master...aerostitch:cleanup_spoa_example_typos
Thanks,
Jos
Hi,
This is not user-visible issues, just a cleanup of comments.
Fixes 3 typos detected in code comments in the contrib/modsecurity subsystem.
The patch is attached, but if you want to view the diff online, you
can check:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/compare/master...aerostitch:cleanup_mo
Hi,
I'm not sure how to subdivide the patches for different subfolders
inside contrib, so starting by sending 1 patch by subfolder.
Let me know if I should do otherwise.
This patch fix 1 typo in a comment in the contrib/halog subsystem.
The patch is attached, but if you want to view the diff onl
Hi,
This is not user-visible issues, just a cleanup of comments.
As the Makefile not really in a given unit of code and is not really
documentation, I created a separated patch for it. let me know if
you'd rather have me group it with another patch.
The patch is attached, but if you want to view
Hi,
Please find attached a patch to fix a few typos detected by misspell
in the README and CONTRIBUTING.
Even if one of them is on a listing of commits. I'm assuming that if
we want to enforce less typos in the commits, having one in the
contributing guide is not the best example.
Thanks
Joseph
F
Hi Willy,
Thanks for responding.
Requests were not using 100-continue. Also setting http-buffer-request
didn't seem to make any difference.
I captured a few sessions as you suggested. The architecture looks
something like this:
(client) -> [http/tcp] -> fe=http_proxy,be=http_proxy,srv=ratelimit
Hi,
Did you get a chance to review my previous emails with the follow up
request?
Looking forward do your response.
Regards,
Elizabeth Lawson
From: elizabeth lawson [mailto:elizabeth.law...@inforeachleads.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 7:24 AM
To: 'haproxy@formilux.or
Hi,
I'm not sure how many people use the feedback functionality in HAProxy?
But I just wanted let anyone interested know that we've written a new
version (and why).
The HAProxy server feedback mechanism is compatible with the
LVS/Ldirectord one (also open source).
With our previous open source W
9 matches
Mail list logo