Hi Thierry, guys,
When receiving a POST request on haproxy, I use lua to compute some values, and
modify the body of the request before forwarding to the backend, so my backend
can get these variables from the POST and use them.
Here is a sample cfg, and lua code to reproduce this.
# Con
Thanks Vincent, got a core dump.
Here is the backtrace
#0 0x5577fb060375 in __pool_get_from_cache (pool=0x5577fb3f7540
) at include/common/memory.h:199
199 include/common/memory.h: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x5577fb060375 in __pool_get_from_cache (pool=0x5577fb3f
Hi.
Am 13.02.2019 um 00:21 schrieb Norman Branitsky:
> I have an HAProxy 1.7 server sitting in front of a number of Docker Enterprise
> Manager nodes and Worker nodes.
>
> The Worker nodes don’t appear to have any problem with HAProxy terminating the
> SSL and connecting to them via HTTP.
>
> Th
Le 13/02/2019 à 09:34, Laurent Penot a écrit :
Hi Thierry, guys,
When receiving a POST request on haproxy, I use lua to compute some
values, and modify the body of the request before forwarding to the
backend, so my backend can get these variables from the POST and use them.
Here is a sample
Le 13/02/2019 à 09:40, m...@mildis.org a écrit :
Thanks Vincent, got a core dump.
Here is the backtrace
#0 0x5577fb060375 in __pool_get_from_cache (pool=0x5577fb3f7540
) at include/common/memory.h:199
199 include/common/memory.h: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x557
Hi Christopher,
I'm so sad
It was really working well in my use case with 1.8 versions.
Thank's a lot for your answer
Best
Laurent
On 13/02/2019 10:56, "Christopher Faulet" wrote:
Le 13/02/2019 à 09:34, Laurent Penot a écrit :
> Hi Thierry, guys,
>
> When receiving a POST r
Le 08/02/2019 à 15:55, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi Marco,
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 02:20:53PM +0100, Marco Corte wrote:
Il 2019-02-07 17:50 Marco Corte ha scritto:
Hello!
I am testing haproxy version 1.9.4 on Ubuntu 18.04.
With the "option http-use-htx", haproxy shows a strange behaviour when
Trying to compile haproxy on my local machine for testing purposes and
am running into the following:
# make TARGET=osx
src/proto_http.c:293:1: error: argument to 'section' attribute
is not valid for this target: mach-o section specifier requires a
segment and section separated by
Am 13.02.2019 um 14:45 schrieb Patrick Hemmer:
> Trying to compile haproxy on my local machine for testing purposes and am
> running into the following:
Which compiler do you use?
> # make TARGET=osx
> src/proto_http.c:293:1: error: argument to 'section' attribute is not
> valid f
On 2019/2/13 09:40, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Am 13.02.2019 um 14:45 schrieb Patrick Hemmer:
>> Trying to compile haproxy on my local machine for testing purposes and am
>> running into the following:
> Which compiler do you use?
# gcc -v
Configured with:
--prefix=/Applications/
Hi Patrick,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:01:01AM -0500, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/2/13 09:40, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > Am 13.02.2019 um 14:45 schrieb Patrick Hemmer:
> >> Trying to compile haproxy on my local machine for testing purposes and am
> >> running into the following:
> > Whi
Willy,
Aleks,
List,
this (absolutely non-ready-to-merge) patch adds support for brotli
compression as suggested in issue #21:
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/21
It is tested on Ubuntu Xenial with libbrotli 1.0.3:
[timwolla@~]apt-cache policy libbrotli-dev
libbrotli-dev
Olivier,
Am 13.02.19 um 16:29 schrieb Olivier Houchard:
> Does the (totally untested, because I have no Mac to test) patch works for
> you ?
>
Note: This was also reported in the bug tracker. Can you add a "see
issue #42" to the message of the final patch?
see: https://github.com/haproxy/haprox
On 2019/2/13 10:29, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:01:01AM -0500, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>>
>> On 2019/2/13 09:40, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>> Am 13.02.2019 um 14:45 schrieb Patrick Hemmer:
Trying to compile haproxy on my local machine for testing purpose
Hi Willy,
Thank you for the detailed response. Sorry for the delay in response.
I ran all the combinations multiple times to ensure consistent
reproducibility.
Here is what i found :
Test Setup (same as last time):
2 Kube pods one running Haproxy 1.8.17 and another running
1.9.2 loadbalancing
Hi,
I am also running into this issue using 1.9.4 (i.e. the current "latest"
docker image) with absolutely no load at all (1 client):
[ALERT] 044/001000 (1) : sendmsg()/writev() failed in logger #1: No such
file or directory (errno=2)
[NOTICE] 044/001000 (1) : New worker #1 (8) forked
[ALERT] 044
Hi Hugues,
On Thursday, 14 February 2019, Hugues Alary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am also running into this issue using 1.9.4 (i.e. the current "latest"
> docker image) with absolutely no load at all (1 client):
>
> [ALERT] 044/001000 (1) : sendmsg()/writev() failed in logger #1: No such
> file or dire
On 19-02-13 16:27:21, Hugues Alary wrote:
> (Also, I've been looking for commit 451c5a88 and can't find it
> anywhere).
See http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.9.git;a=commit;h=451c5a88, also
attached.
Cheers,
Georg
From 451c5a8879a9d59b489ad5117c984044d41c8338 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will
18 matches
Mail list logo