Hi all,
I've several socks5 servers running locally on the following ports:
127.0.0.1:1081
127.0.0.1:1082
127.0.0.1:1083
127.0.0.1:1084
All of them can be anonymous accessed locally, I want to balance the
using of them for offering one robust socks5 proxy on 127.0.0.1:8889.
So, I using the
Le 21/06/2019 à 17:00, Senthil Naidu a écrit :
Hi,
I am using haproxy 2.0.0 , when I am using IE I can see in the logs the first
request is reaching the real server and when I do the refresh all subsequent
request is hitting the cache of haproxy, when I use firefox/crome all the
request are
Hi all,
exactly like I predicted (I should have written it publicly), submissions
of talks for the conference have started to accelerate very close to the
deadline, which was today. I got some private comments saying that some
people were as busy as we were over the last week, so I was informed
Hi,
I am using haproxy 2.0.0 , when I am using IE I can see in the logs the first
request is reaching the real server and when I do the refresh all subsequent
request is hitting the cache of haproxy, when I use firefox/crome all the
request are served by real server only its not hitting the
Le 21/06/2019 à 16:39, Senthil Naidu a écrit :
I am testing the small object caching feature , when I am trying to browse the
site behind haproxy using IE the cache is working but when I try the same from
firefox or crome the caching functionality is not working.
Has anybody faced this issue.
Hi,
I am testing the small object caching feature , when I am trying to browse the
site behind haproxy using IE the cache is working but when I try the same from
firefox or crome the caching functionality is not working.
Has anybody faced this issue.
Regards
Senthil
Senthil Naidu
General
Hello all,
Is it possible to use the new `http-request do-resolve` to do reverse DNS
lookups? It's left unspecified in the documentation, and I think it'd be
helpful to clarify for posterity.
I'd like to integrate this as part of a IP blocking methodology, but that would
depend on rDNS being
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 08:29:35AM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> Willy, could you merge this patch please?
Now done, thanks guys,
Willy
On 6/20/19 1:02 PM, William Dauchy wrote:
Hi Fred,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 09:44:51AM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
In fact it seems I have broken something and missed this case.
Here is a patch which should fix this issue.
Thanks for the patch, it fixes the issue.
From
10 matches
Mail list logo