Re: [PR] MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd

On 2019-09-18 at 08:27 +0200 Lukas Tribus sent off: > If you want to see the ulimit value move, bump your global maxconn and you > will see how haproxy adjusts the ulimit. true, I can confirm this. Thanks Björn

Re: [PR] MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd

Hello Björn, On Wednesday, 18 September 2019, Björn Jacke wrote: > Hi, > On 2019-09-18 at 01:23 +0200 Lukas Tribus sent off: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:14 AM PR Bot > wrote: > > > Description: > > >systemd by default limits the max open files to 1k, which also > limits > > >the sock

Re: [PR] MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd

On 2019-09-18 at 08:06 +0200 Björn Jacke sent off: > unless the systemd limit is removed with the change I made in the systemd > service file? systemd uses cgroups and cgroup limits, which are enforced independently from ulimits, and this is probably why this is required and why haproxy is currenl

Re: [PR] MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd

Hi, On 2019-09-18 at 01:23 +0200 Lukas Tribus sent off: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:14 AM PR Bot > wrote: > > Description: > >systemd by default limits the max open files to 1k, which also limits > >the socket connections to 1k, the service script must be told to > >remove the limit.

Re: [PR] MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd

Hello, On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:14 AM PR Bot wrote: > Description: >systemd by default limits the max open files to 1k, which also limits >the socket connections to 1k, the service script must be told to >remove the limit. Since haproxy is started as root we have the privilege to bu

[PR] MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd

Dear list! Author: Björn Jacke Number of patches: 1 This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd Patch title(s): MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd Link: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull

Connection reuse for HTTP/2?

Hi all, Is there a way to multiplex frontend HTTP/2 (GRPC) connections onto a shared pool of backend HTTP/2 connections? My testing shows that one frontend connection with multiple concurrent requests will reuse one backend connection, but multiple frontend connections will not share backend c

[PR] MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd

Dear list! Author: Björn Jacke Number of patches: 1 This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd Patch title(s): MINOR: remove limit of 1k socket connections with systemd Link: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull

Re: PATCH: install golang-1.13 during travis-ci build as it is required for BoringSSL

Le 17/09/2019 à 09:48, Илья Шипицин a écrit : Willy, can you apply this ? boringssl builds are bloody murder пн, 16 сент. 2019 г. в 16:14, Илья Шипицин >: please see attached patch Merged. -- Christopher Faulet

Re: BUG/MEDIUM: spoe: engine-id is necessary if not health check

Le 16/09/2019 à 03:40, Kevin Zhu a écrit : Sorry Crhistopher, have you look at this mail ?😁 On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 16:11, Kevin Zhu > wrote: Hi Christopher SPOE engine-id is all same when nbproc is more than 1, the clients all group under same engine, and s

Re: PATCH: install golang-1.13 during travis-ci build as it is required for BoringSSL

Willy, can you apply this ? boringssl builds are bloody murder пн, 16 сент. 2019 г. в 16:14, Илья Шипицин : > please see attached patch >