Hi Tim,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 01:32:49AM +0100, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> I did not touch the `struct pat_time` in pattern.h which appears to be
> completely unused. Please check whether adjustments should be made there
> as well or whether it should simply be removed. Feel free to
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 01:46:18AM +0100, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> This issue was introduced in commit 99a17a2d91f9044ea20bba6617048488aed80555
> which first appeared in tag v1.9-dev11. This bugfix should be backported
> to HAProxy 1.9+.
Applied, thanks.
Willy
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 03:53:18PM +0100, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> This fixes up commit 2252beb8557d73407b8f96eef91d6927fb855685.
Applied, thanks.
Willy
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 02:04:12AM +0100, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> Left shifting of large signed values and negative values is undefined.
Applied, thanks.
Willy
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 03:09:53PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Elliot,
>
> Am 17.01.20 um 14:57 schrieb Elliot Otchet:
> > Thanks again. Update provided: - Fixes the issue Tim points out by using
> > strcmp. - Corrects the argument spacing - Updates to include my name in the
> > patch
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:17 PM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020, 23:12 William Lallemand
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>> > Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123
>>
>> This binary was built with code from 1 week
Left shifting of large signed values and negative values is undefined.
In a test script clang's ubsan rightfully complains:
> runtime error: left shift of 1934242336581872173 by 13 places cannot be
> represented in type 'int64_t' (aka 'long')
This bug was introduced in the initial version of
This issue was introduced in commit 99a17a2d91f9044ea20bba6617048488aed80555
which first appeared in tag v1.9-dev11. This bugfix should be backported
to HAProxy 1.9+.
---
src/cache.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/cache.c b/src/cache.c
index
Willy,
I did not touch the `struct pat_time` in pattern.h which appears to be
completely unused. Please check whether adjustments should be made there
as well or whether it should simply be removed. Feel free to amend my
patch if necessary.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Apply with `git am
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020, 23:12 William Lallemand
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123
>
> This binary was built with code from 1 week ago, it's normal that the test
> does
> not work since the fix was made
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123
This binary was built with code from 1 week ago, it's normal that the test does
not work since the fix was made this week.
--
William Lallemand
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 08:50:27PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> Please find attached the output.
>
> this two lines look bad in it:
>
> *** h1 debug|[ALERT] 016/184150 (7188) : parsing [cur--1:0] : proxy
> 'MASTER', another server named 'cur--1' was already defined at line
Hi Илья,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:43 PM Илья Шипицин wrote:
>
>
> пт, 17 янв. 2020 г. в 19:33, Martin Grigorov :
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 4:13 PM Martin Grigorov <
>> martin.grigo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today's build consistently fails on my ARM64 VM:
>>>
>>>
Hi William,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 4:46 PM William Lallemand
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 04:33:22PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> >
> > git bisect blaims this commit:
> >
> > 25b569302167e71b32e569a2366027e8e320e80a is the first bad commit
> > commit
пт, 17 янв. 2020 г. в 19:33, Martin Grigorov :
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 4:13 PM Martin Grigorov
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's build consistently fails on my ARM64 VM:
>>
>> ## Starting vtest ##
>> Testing with haproxy version:
This fixes up commit 2252beb8557d73407b8f96eef91d6927fb855685.
---
doc/configuration.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt
index 9ac898517..6f59fac3c 100644
--- a/doc/configuration.txt
+++ b/doc/configuration.txt
@@
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 04:33:22PM +0200, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
> git bisect blaims this commit:
>
> 25b569302167e71b32e569a2366027e8e320e80a is the first bad commit
> commit 25b569302167e71b32e569a2366027e8e320e80a
> Author: William Lallemand
> Date: Tue Jan 14 15:38:43 2020 +0100
>
>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 4:13 PM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's build consistently fails on my ARM64 VM:
>
> ## Starting vtest ##
> Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123
> #top TEST reg-tests/mcli/mcli_start_progs.vtc
Hi all,
Today's build consistently fails on my ARM64 VM:
## Starting vtest ##
Testing with haproxy version: 2.2-dev0-70c5b0-123
#top TEST reg-tests/mcli/mcli_start_progs.vtc FAILED (3.004) exit=2
1 tests failed, 0 tests skipped, 34 tests
Elliot,
Am 17.01.20 um 14:57 schrieb Elliot Otchet:
> Thanks again. Update provided: - Fixes the issue Tim points out by using
> strcmp. - Corrects the argument spacing - Updates to include my name in the
> patch submission. Yes, you can use my name.
You missed on the commit message
Tim, Willy,
Thanks again. Update provided: - Fixes the issue Tim points out by using
strcmp. - Corrects the argument spacing - Updates to include my name in the
patch submission. Yes, you can use my name.
Thanks!
-Elliot
On Friday, January 17, 2020, 5:58:43 AM EST, Willy Tarreau
wrote:
Thierry,
Am 14.01.20 um 19:37 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
> Willy,
>
> Am 14.01.20 um 14:53 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 02:04:04PM +0100, Thierry Fournier wrote:
>>> Idea 1:
>>>
>>>lua-prepend-path path /etc/haproxy/lua-modules/?.lua
>>>lua-prepend-path cpath
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:45:17AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> I did not test, but if I am not mistaken this would allow "rfc2253XXX"
> as the format parameter, no? Meaning: It allows one to append arbitrary
> garbage to the rfc2253 value.
> Judging from `smp_check_const_bool` in sample.c a
Elliot,
Am 17.01.20 um 05:35 schrieb Elliot Otchet:
> An updated patch for your consideration. Let me know what you think.
>
I have some very minor suggestions:
> Subject: [PATCH] MEDIUM: ssl: Add support for returning the dn samples from
> ssl_(c|f)_(i|s)_dn in LDAP v3 (RFC2253) format.
>
24 matches
Mail list logo