Question regarding increasing requests more than 32kb

2020-04-12 Thread Aravind Viswanathan
Hi Team, Good Morning. We are using HaProxy as a load balancer in our bitbucket system and Bitbucket is linked to JIRA via Application links. Recently we noticed an error in our JIRA log 2020-04-01 03:08:23,477 Caesium-1-3 ERROR ServiceRunner [c.a.j.p.devstatus.provider.DefaultDevSummaryP

Re: interpreting haproxy 2.1 EOL statement

2020-04-12 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
On 03.03.20 15:28, Andrew McDermott wrote: Hi, From the following: $ ~/git.haproxy.org/haproxy-2.1/haproxy -v HA-Proxy version 2.1.3-ce757f-13 2020/02/21 - https://haproxy.org/ Status: stable branch - will stop receiving fixes around Q1 2021. Known bugs: http://www.haproxy.org/bu

Re: TLV problem after updating to 2.1.14

2020-04-12 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:32:40PM +0200, Hativ wrote: > Thanks for the patch, tested it, worked. Great, thanks! So I think we'll have to merge this one. What I think would be the best approach would be to get backport it to all branches where the original patch that revealed the bug was backporte

Re: TLV problem after updating to 2.1.14

2020-04-12 Thread Hativ
Am Sonntag, den 12.04.2020, 18:19 +0200 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > Hello Hativ, > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 09:49:02AM +0200, Hativ wrote: > > Hello Willy, > > > Hativ, if I send you a patch to test next week, is it possible > > > togiveit a try on your side ? I'm interested in knowing if a > > > clea

RE: TLV problem after updating to 2.1.14

2020-04-12 Thread Stefan Johansson
Hi Willy, 4 week of junk food does clearly have it's drawbacks, I hope you at least managed some Easter/holiday themed food ;) We're happy and grateful that you are still around supporting us, even through these difficult times. Stay safe and all the best wishes for many years of haProxy still

Re: TLV problem after updating to 2.1.14

2020-04-12 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hello Hativ, On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 09:49:02AM +0200, Hativ wrote: > Hello Willy, > > Hativ, if I send you a patch to test next week, is it possible to > > give > > it a try on your side ? I'm interested in knowing if a clean "LOCAL" > > connection works fine with Dovecot. If so then in parallel

Re: TLV problem after updating to 2.1.14

2020-04-12 Thread Hativ
Hello Willy, > Hativ, if I send you a patch to test next week, is it possible to > give > it a try on your side ? I'm interested in knowing if a clean "LOCAL" > connection works fine with Dovecot. If so then in parallel we can > file > a report on Dovecot to make their parser more robust but at lea