Le 07/07/2020 à 23:02, Christopher Faulet a écrit :
Le 07/07/2020 à 15:16, Michael Wimmesberger a écrit :
Hi,
I might have found a potentially critical bug in haproxy. It occurs when
haproxy is retrying to dispatch a request to a server. If haproxy fails
to dispatch a request to a server that i
Ryan,
Am 09.07.20 um 20:34 schrieb Ryan O'Hara:
> I'm currently packaging this for Fedora. It seems to build just fine on
> Fedora 32 and rawhide. Is there any new build options or dependencies to be
> aware of? I'm looking at the Makefile now and nothing jumps out at me. That
> said, I am totally
Hi Ryan,
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:34:40PM -0500, Ryan O'Hara wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:41 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > HAProxy 2.2.0 was released on 2020/07/07. It added 24 new commits
> > after version 2.2-dev12.
> >
>
> This is great. Thank you to all who contributed t
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:41 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 2.2.0 was released on 2020/07/07. It added 24 new commits
> after version 2.2-dev12.
>
This is great. Thank you to all who contributed to this release.
I'm currently packaging this for Fedora. It seems to build just fine on
Good day, I work on behalf of JPMorgan Chase Bank and we are looking for
someone with strong experience in HAProxy for a launch set for Feb. 2021. It
is for the area of the bank that provides authentication services globally and
is a high availability system. We want to add HAProxy technology
Hi,
I config haproxy as a layer 4 socks5 load balancing gateway which use
several upstream socks5 servers and listening on 127.0.0.1:1. When
I use this aggregated local socks5 server for registering a user
account on wine forum here: https://forum.winehq.org/, I always
failed in this job. Fin
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:35:57PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> let it settle down a bit/
>
>
> I'll have a look in few days
Great, thanks!
Willy
let it settle down a bit/
I'll have a look in few days
чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 13:29, Willy Tarreau :
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:19:32PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > We install socat, because it is (or was?) needed for some tests. OSX
> > requires to update whole brew for that. Otherwise it wo
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 12:19:32PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> We install socat, because it is (or was?) needed for some tests. OSX
> requires to update whole brew for that. Otherwise it works unstable
Wow, so the we'd rather build and install socat ourselves from sources,
because quite frankly h
Hi Илья,
I think that Travis’ Homebrew plugin is just fine, but I would definitely avoid
updating/upgrading Homebrew as that’s certainly going to make builds much
slower.
Do you have any sample logs of the situation where socat failed to install with
non-updated Homebrew? It doesn’t make sense
Dinko,
do you think does it make sense to use scripted brew instead of travis
plugin ?
if so, we can try to "brew instal blah-blah-blah || ok, we failed, lets'
update and install one more time"
чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 13:07, Илья Шипицин :
> we have homebrew --> update --> true
>
> https://github.
we have homebrew --> update --> true
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/master/.travis.yml#L26
if we remove it, brew will not get updated.
most of the time it is not an issue and we can install socat. but under
some circumstances socat refuses to install without brew update
чт, 9 июл. 20
I would suggest using HOMEBREW_NO_AUTO_UPDATE environment variable to avoid
Brew auto-updating where it’s not really needed, for instance as in:
HOMEBREW_NO_AUTO_UPDATE=1 brew install socat
If that doesn’t work (but I think it should), pinning will cause none of
dependancies to be installed aut
We install socat, because it is (or was?) needed for some tests. OSX
requires to update whole brew for that. Otherwise it works unstable
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020, 9:16 AM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> is it normal that the OSX build procedure in travis pulls gigabytes of
> ruby and python crap,
14 matches
Mail list logo
